📺 Develpreneur YouTube Episode

Video + transcript

Tiered Pricing in the AI Era: What Actually Works | Dan Balcauski (Part 2)

2026-01-22 Youtube

Detailed Notes

In Part 2 of our interview with Dan Balcauski (Founder & Chief Pricing Officer at Product Tranquility), we explore tiered pricing in the AI era — how SaaS companies can package AI features in a way customers understand, while still protecting margins as AI costs become real and variable.

We talk through why “good, better, best” tiers are showing up everywhere, when AI should be included in higher tiers vs sold as an add-on, and why token-based pricing often creates friction for both buyers and sales teams.

Key topics in this episode • Why AI is changing SaaS pricing faster than most teams expect • How tiered pricing helps align value and margin reality • When to put AI in Better/Best vs when to create an add-on • A practical example: pricing AI by outcomes (not tokens) • How to choose usage metrics customers actually understand

🌐 Develpreneur / Building Better Developers: https://develpreneur.com/tiered-pricing-ai-era

*Follow-us on:*

* [email protected] * https://develpreneur.com/ * https://www.youtube.com/@develpreneur * https://facebook.com/Develpreneur * https://x.com/develpreneur * https://www.linkedin.com/company/develpreneur/

Subscribe for more episodes on building better products, teams, and businesses.

Transcript Text
Well, hello and welcome back. We are
here continuing our season of building
better foundations. We are building
better developers, the developer
podcast. I happen to be Rob Broadhead, a
founder of developer better building
better developers, also the founder of
RB Consulting, where we help you assess
your technology and build a roadmap to
success. Good things and bad things.
I have been good things. I have been
talking about like technology and cool
tools and stuff like that recently and
have found that there are like I said
there's just a lot of neat things I've
been able to do that allow me to really
like embrace digital nomad and all of
those kinds of things having a you know
a virtual office uh being able to have
conversations with people being able to
keep in touch and it's it's really been
awesome. This is a a really good thing.
Uh I really enjoy it. So this is in the
plus column. Um the negative column is
doing so now I have more of a feel like
I'm in a studio when I do these things.
So I have like bright lights on me and
things like that that drive me a little
bit nuts or maybe nutser a little bit
more beyond where I normally my sanity
level normally lies much like my co-host
who drives me crazy on a regular basis
for a wide range of reasons. But go
ahead and introduce yourself. Hey
everyone, my name is Michael Malash. I'm
one of the co-founders of developer
building better developers. I'm also the
founder of Envision QA where we build
and test custom software that helps
businesses run smoother and grow faster.
Uh good thing bad thing uh good thing uh
said technology. Uh I like playing with
gadgets and that and uh I I love playing
with those little studio things and
video uh equipment. Uh bad thing is the
audio editing tools are a pain in the
butt. It's like one tool works great for
one thing, another tool works great for
another, but unless you pay a lot of
money, you can't really do it all in
one. So, it sometimes these edits get a
little complicated.
I will say that of the tools that we've
played around with over the years,
although I did it manually for a long
time, uh Adobe's tools were are
topnotch. Uh although my son who does a
lot of this would actually argue some of
those, there are some better tools out
there now. Uh I found actually descript
has been a is a really good tool to take
a look at and it does do uh it has
progressed very well and very quickly.
So uh but this is an area where there's
a lot of change because of AI and stuff
like that. So I would say check your new
tools on a regular basis because there
are cool stuff out there and maybe a
better price point. All of that being
said, let us now return to our
conversation with Dan Boowski and we're
going to talk more about pricing. And
yeah, we're going to range far and wide,
but pencils up because I think you're
going to want to take notes. There's
some really good uh areas, even areas
that we don't dig into necessarily to go
too deep. Uh but we will have links in
the show notes and all that kind of good
stuff for you to check in with Dan at
another time and see if maybe you can
have a conversation with him to go
deeper in those areas. Here we go back
where we left off in our conversation
with Dan.
>> I love that. Um, so I have one more
question. I'll pass it back to Rob. So
where do you see in this modern age of
AI SAS pricing going over the next few
years?
>> Oh, big big question.
>> There's so many different areas to touch
on here, so I'll try to boil it down to
a couple.
I think one thing that we're seeing
right now is an incredible amount of
dynamism in the software pricing space
that maybe we've not seen for a very
long time. I think probably the last
thing it was comparable to was the
transition from perpetual to SAS models
maybe about 15 years ago at this point.
So, one of the things that's happening
is that you've seen competitive dynamics
unlike anything you're ever seeing at
the sort of foundational model layer.
And I think there's there's kind of two
there's multiple battlefronts here,
which is one of the reasons why it's so
complicated. If we just focus, for
example, on say the foundational AI
model companies,
you see every week they're oneuping each
other with a, you know, Anthropic just
did this, you know, a week or two ago
when they launched Opus 45. it's now the
best model and they dropped the price
right what was you know so you just by
that alone you could see sort of the
dynamics uh that are that are happening
um and so we're seeing constant you know
iteration and update as folks try to uh
figure that part out I would say on the
other side you know where we might talk
about AI enabled uh software platforms
so you know every board of directors has
asked their CEO since the launch of chat
GBT in late 2022 do what are we doing
with about AI and we've seen a lot of
interesting experiments. I don't know
that anything has you know fully uh you
know been a home run yet but um so
everyone is baking AI enabled
capabilities into their products and so
what we're seeing there is a very real
tension between
how do we monetize this thing? Is it
ready to monetize? And how do we manage
margin? Because software has got to
exist in a very
privileged position of world industries
where, you know, if I sell you hammers,
I have to care how much it costs me to
land that hammer manufactured to put it
into Home Depot. Like, I can't just be
like, I'll I'll I'll charge you a $150
per hammer and like I'll figure it out
on the back end. Like, no, you're not
going to be in business very long. But
software companies forever have been
able to do that.
There's been some exception but you know
the marginal cost to serve because
network storage compute has been almost
infinite testably small per you know
incremental user basis that they've been
able to ignore such things and so now
there's a real trade-off that those
companies are facing. Okay, we're now
seeing a you know the CFO is seeing a
giant check every month going out the
door to OpenAI or Anthropic or to
Google.
How are we what are we doing about this?
And so we're seeing a lot of comp what
what I think fundamentally is changing
is that companies are having to look at
their pricing a lot sooner in their life
cycle to account for this. Uh and
there's many other sort of dynamics I
could talk about, but I wanted to just
start there and lay out some uh
landscape.
>> Well, I think that that sort of leads
back to something I wanted to swing back
around to actually. I guess we'll start
with this one. Um
because we you we started off talking
about like premium and things like that
and how do you I want to sort of combine
wrap this into two questions is how do
you look at tiered pricing you know like
the famous like you know bronze silver
and gold approach uh which to me feels
similar because there's always like the
free demo and then bronze silver gold
that that tend to be out there and then
>> how how do you see for example these
like these SAS tools that are out there.
Um, how do you see that like adjusting
pricing based on the for example like
now we're going to have AI as part of
you know certain tiers or things like
that and it falls into the same to me it
falls in the same categories of things
like what do you how do you do you
adjust your pricing based on um you know
like the monetary flow and things like
that. if you suddenly have you know
contraction or expansion or you know
things like that in in pricing models uh
because AI is definitely going to be a
part of that as I think it's it's
lowering the cost of the technical tools
in a sense or at least has the
opportunity to do that. So how do you
see that impacting pricing or how should
that factor into the impact of pricing?
>> Yeah. Um this is a great question. Um so
a couple different things. So when you
talk about you know the bronze, silver,
gold, sometimes folks refer to that as,
you know, good, better, best. Um the so
that is one of the ways that we're
seeing SAS companies monetize today and
I think it makes a lot of sense in
certain use cases. So uh the you know
example would be uh so I'll use intercom
because I think they've actually done
really this really smartly. So, Intercom
does a lot of things, but one of the
things worlds they compete in is the
world of customer service uh agent
software. So, they compete with like the
Zenesks of the world um for customer
support systems. And so, they have a
platform that has a good, better, best.
And so one of the things is some of
their AI capabilities like summarize the
entire transaction history with this
account and all their service tickets or
the the last you know the history you
know imagine a service agent gets
bounced midway through a support
experience right and then maybe there's
a bunch of different notes summarize all
this so that capability maybe that's in
the better or best tier to help drive
upgrade and maybe I leave my tier
pricing alone at like a price point
level. But say you know in that case
customer support software much like CRM
often priced per user because like how
many customer support agents do you have
using the platform uh often translates
really nicely to the value you're
providing and that value is
that value driver is enhancing that
agent's ability to be effective be
higher performance answer tickets
faster.
The other reason I'm using intercom is
because they also did something separate
which is they created what they call
their finai which is their automated
sort of support deflection agent and for
that they created a entirely separate
pricing model because
the value driver there is hey you don't
need to get any agents involved at all
this thing sits on your website your
customers come and have a you know
intercom's obvious thing that you know
they they started this a bunch of other
people copied it but they're sitting on
the the bottom right corner of your uh
website, your little chat window pops
up. So, hey, if we can answer your
customer's support questions before they
ever come to your agent, we'll just
charge you 99 cents per resolution.
And there, you're not enhancing the
value of the customer support agent.
Instead, you have a different brand new
value driver where the user is not even
involved. And so, they separated that
functionality out.
I like the way Intercom has done that
and that structure as well because I'll
just maybe lay out some bad practices
that I've seen folks creep into, which
is, hey, we've got this bill for
whatever $20,000 a month we're paying to
OpenAI.
They're charging us per token. So, we're
going to add a
per token usage through our platform
writer to all of our pricing or we're
going to add a per token usage limit to
the problem with that is customers have
no freaking clue what a token is and
they don't want to know what a token is.
Your sales people don't want to know
what a token is. They definitely don't
want to have to explain it on a sales
call because it has nothing to do with
your product. If you're selling a CRM
and all of a sudden you're in the world
explaining what AI tokens are, like
you've already lost the battle. Like
even if you have the best salesperson in
the world and they have some amazing
pitch, like you've still gone off the
rails trying to explain to a customer,
you've moved from talking about their
problem, how many sales people have? I
got 100. Great. It's 10 bucks a user.
It's 1,000 bucks a month. Awesome. Sign
me up. Now all of a sudden, now we're
talking about infrastructure and your
costs and customers don't give a
about that. So it's a really bad idea.
adds sand in the motion. There's sand in
the gears of your go to market machine.
So, you know what the Finn AI example I
like is they were able to, you know, and
so there's there's permutations, right?
You you know, if you really believe it's
driving value, maybe you increase the
cost of those higher tiers in the in the
good, better, best model that have the
AI plans to help, you know, uh cover
that. Um, but either way, you've left it
as per user price on those plans and a
hey 99 cent per resolution, right? We're
not talking about how hard our AI is got
to work or we're using Open AI under the
hood and we got to pay them a bunch of
money so we're going to charge you some
approximate cause. It and companies
should have learned this because they
had to go through the same thing back in
the days of like the Twilio with like
per SMS because the if you ever looked
at telecom pricing it's like
every geography two geography is like
this giant matrix. Um, and so, you know,
companies have had to deal with even
worse before. But, you know, net net is
if you're going to try to cap some sort
of usage metric, make it something that
your customers are already tracking at
best or at least is related to what
they're going to be doing with your
product in a way that's not tokens.
>> Do you find God every time we have a
every question we could expanded like
six others? Um, let me say I but this is
like that's the thing is pricing is can
be very complicated. Can be very there's
a there are a lot of factors. I mean
it's amazing how often we'll have
somebody that's a consultant type and
they'll say well the answer will be well
that depends and pricing it feels like
is even more so. It's just there's just
so many nuances and details that can
that you can use and dials and such to
to hit. Uh but I want to swing back to
something that I guess is like getting
back from the idea of like a to the idea
of like a startup or product or
something like that. Um I want to like
the idea of we talked about like trials
and trial periods and seven and 14 and
30 days and stuff like that. One of the
things I see a lot uh and now I'm seeing
even I always saw it in B2B more and now
I'm seeing in B TOC and uh actually push
it for my the businesses that I talk
about is to take advantage of these is
the idea of demos where instead of a a
free trial is you really sit down you
you as a company you have some resources
dedicated to look we're going to walk
you through this product particularly I
think when you get into business
products like even CRM and things like
that it's like hey this is we need
this gets past the support and some of
those kinds. Let's let us show you how
this can work for you. And what I want
to I want to know like how much of that
you have factored in with some of the
pricing that you've you know discussions
you have is that something that actually
because a question I have is could that
possibly allow you to offer ask for a
higher pricing? Does it does it maybe
convert better or allow you to to have a
little more of a feel of like this is
the you know this is the Porsche version
versus the Kia version of of this
product?
>> Yeah. Well, I mean I'm not 100% sure I'm
tracking your question, but I think you
know for any
talk about monetization, you always need
to think about creating value,
communicating value, and capturing
value. So if you think about your demo,
is is the demo actually effectively
communicating value? Because if we can't
communicate it, then you know only a
consumer's
perceived value of the product matters
to their willingness to pay. So you may
be able to write out a beautiful Excel
model that shows how we create millions
of dollars of ROI for you and your
company. And
if customer doesn't believe it, prospect
doesn't believe it, like that's done no
work for you, right? Maybe it's real.
Maybe you're like, "Hey, this is the
data. You know, we we have thousands of
customers, but they don't believe it. If
their perception doesn't change, then
you haven't influenced, you know, the
final number, which is their willingness
to pay." So the question then is just
have you architected
uh demo effectively or is there an
ability to do a free trial? You know,
like I will I will say 99.9% of the time
a free trial where I can actually put my
data in and play around with it myself
is going to increase my perceived value
more so than a salesperson sitting on a
call with me running me through a demo.
Because I mean we all know how we are,
right? I mean most of us can't even
watch a full Netflix without checking
our phones, let alone some demo of some
business software. Our minds in 20
different places versus, oh, I'm
hands-on. I'm interactive with this
thing. So then the question is if we I
want to tie this back though to the idea
of these offer configurations or good
better best structure. If we've done our
jobs well we should be able to say gold
silver bronze for each of those who is
this for
>> we have designed those tiers with a
particular customer segment in mind. If
we start with that end in mind, it makes
this process you're talking about all
the more effective. Why? Because we say
look the customers in our minds is a
hypothesis and we'll tweak and tune as
we go along. But we believe this kind of
customer has this type of context
usually could cap encapsulate that in
maybe three to five kind of discovery
questions.
Those are discovery questions we now
enable our sales folks with. based upon
their answers, we now have cool, my demo
script is aligned to showing them this
and at the end I have a tier that's
perfectly meant for you with a price
point. So, have we thought about that
entire flow of the salesperson sitting
on a call saying, "Okay, Mr. Customer,
nice to meet you. Tell me a little bit
about your business. What about this? Do
you guys ever struggle with that?" Oh,
that's interesting. You ever struggle
with this? Cool. Boom, boom, boom, boom,
boom. let me show you how our product
solves all those problems through a demo
that aligns to the features that are in
the tier that you're believe that
they're suited to sell and we make that
more effective. So I just put that all
under are we communicating value
effectively.
>> Oh that's a that goes back to a comment
you made earlier about the because it
really is it's like you're the some CEOs
will be like well you're leaving money
on the table just like anything else.
It's like because you're saying no to as
soon as you segment anybody, you're now
saying no to everybody outside of that
segment. And now the interesting
question there is when you have those
tiers and you say which makes perfect
sense is you have now let's say you have
three tiers. So you've got these three
layer you've got three specific types of
customers essentially three avatars that
you're serving. Each product is
perfectly suited to them. So when you
talk to a CEO or a company or founder
about that, do you get push back of the
like, okay, we're going after the bronze
person or, you know, this is what this
looks like, do you get the push back of,
but wait, we want to be able to upsell
them as well as opposed to and and maybe
does that does that muddy the waters or
is that actually something that you like
say, okay, we're going to target the the
we'll call them the lower end or the
less, you know, the less margin
customer. Should we talk about upselling
and and and trying to get them into that
higher tier uh you know level or or
offering?
>> Yeah. Um
I used to think that way. Um the I I've
I've learned the hard way that you don't
get out of a pricing exercise without
having that conversation. So you have to
frontload it. So we didn't talk about
kind of my core model, but it starts
with customer segmentation. That's the
first step of a pricing exercise because
if you don't do that, inevitably you're
going to be at the executive review of
the new pricing and and invariably this
question will come up. Well, this is
great, but what about X customer? This
won't work for X customer. So, I've
learned you want to have that
conversation at the beginning. Like have
everyone say, "What about X customer?
What about Y customer? What about JP
Morgan? Because blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah, right? Get all that and
then help them figure out who are their
customer segments and get those defined
and then build the pricing and packaging
around that as a foundation because if
you get to the end and you haven't done
that in inevitably it's going to blow up
with that qu that line of questioning.
That actually is a perfect segue as
we're sort of like hitting it like this
thing could go like I said we could do a
whole season I think just talking about
pricing and all these different areas
and the different approaches to it and
what works and what doesn't. Um so I
think right there because we we haven't
even talked too much about your model
and your approach. we got way off into
other places, which is a perfect setup
for people that now hopefully they have
got a nice teaser of like this is
somebody that maybe I should talk to.
Maybe this Dan guy knows a couple of
things and would be worth reaching out
to. And in so doing, what is the best
way for them to get a hold of you?
>> Yeah. Uh I'm on LinkedIn, Dan Blowski.
So folks can reach out to me there. Just
let me know you heard me on the podcast
so I could separate it from the rest of
the random LinkedIn spam. Um or uh you
know go to my website productquility.com
um there's a way to contact me there. I
also try to blog about this stuff uh as
often as I I can uh manage try to
demystify this uh you know I have got a
lot of scar tissue uh so we'll uh you
know happy to happy to share that love
and I try to do that through my writing.
I also have a podcast called SAS scaling
secrets myself where I interview uh
scale up B2B SAS CEOs about all the ways
that to scale their companies. So folks
could find that wherever podcasts are
found.
>> Awesome. because I think we've got more
than a few people in the audience that
have that seems to be like the that
seems to be the
one of the more popular ways to launch
products these days. People look at it
and realize like I don't want to I don't
want to do a desktop install or I don't
want to do a a website necessarily
that's not going to have that that
stickiness that SAS tends to. So
definitely you guys can check that
podcast out. There will be links in the
show notes for sure for all of this. And
that will wrap this one up. Uh, I want
to thank you so much, Dan, for hanging
out with us and having this conversation
and allowing it to go all over the place
as conversations sometimes do. But
that's sort of the messy part, I think,
of pricing and products and, uh, it gets
back to like this goes back something we
talk about so often is the why is it's
like who's your customer, who are you
serving, what is the problem you're
solving, and does the solution also
actually solve the problem in a way that
people are like, "Yes, take my money."
Uh, so you always want to find those
people that are on the desert and you're
selling them a bottle of water as
opposed to the people that have just
gotten out of, you know, just walked off
a boat where they about drowned and now
you're like, "Hey, would you like a
little more water on top of that?"
>> So, thank you so much for your time. I
appreciate you hanging out with us, Dan.
>> Thanks for having me. It's fun.
>> All right. And for all the rest of you,
uh, check us out in the show notes and
the the links there for him. And if you
leave any comments for us, we will pass
those on. Or reach out to him directly.
It'll be that much easier. Uh go out
there and have yourselves a great day, a
great week, and we will talk to you next
time.
Uh let's see. So, we do a a video as
well and we have a bonus. So, uh I love
for the the interviews. It's like what
would be one somebody comes to you and
says, "I've got a product. I need to
figure out pricing." What would be like
and I don't know where to begin. What
would be like a first step that you say
this is where you should begin with your
your pricing journey?
Um
well uh I would say two things. Uh I
actually have a uh a SAS CEO pricing
scorecard on my website. So that's a
good uh sort of a self assessment and
then there's some prescriptive tips for
uh helping through different scenarios
because as we've talked about pricing
can cover a lot of ground whether that's
governance nobody owns pricing that's a
problem or or discounting is all over
map that's a problem right or you know
more of the strategic pricing
considerations that we discussed on on
the show um you know I'd say areas of of
highest leverage you know for folks just
getting started is one thing I've
learned is there's a difference between
having a discounting policy and
enforcing a discounting policy and you
want to make sure you're doing both. Um
because that's at the front end, right?
If we think about the your developer
audience will understand APIs, you know,
that's the API for your pricing, right?
So, we could have some beautiful
strategic pricing that in the boardroom
looked amazing on PowerPoint, uh but
your sales folks just do whatever they
want. The market's never going to know
about that beautiful pricing. So, it's
usually a really good first step for
folks to say, do we have a price a
discounting policy and are we actually
enforcing and monitoring and tuning that
over time? Um, so I think that's a
really good tactical first place to stop
start. Uh, because we go do a bunch of
really cool strategic work in the
boardroom and if we launch it, we're not
going to see as much impact. Oh, that's
a that's a cl I've got I've got
nightmare horror stories in my past of
companies where the the salespeople were
able to pretty much just do whatever
pricing wise and they ended up into all
they had all kinds of issues with that
as far as like some things were not even
profitable. Uh and then trying to
actually like when they tried to
standardize it, it was a nightmare
because everybody was like I've got a
10-year contract with this thing like oh
that's not going to work. We're going
have to find a way to you know reset
that. And people aren't happy when
they've already like budgeted that out.
All right. Well, we'll let you get back
to your day. Thanks for hanging out.
Thanks for the bonus. Uh actually, I
guess two little bonus points there. And
we will uh we'll get this out. This will
be coming out. I think we're like at
late January now, somewhere around
there.
>> Think we're in February now.
>> Early February. Uh we'll do it'll be a
two-parter. So, it'll be a Tuesday and a
Thursday. And as we get closer to those
links and have those available, we will
send them out and allow you to share
those out.
>> Just out of out of out of curiosity, why
why do you do two-parters? I don't care.
I just like I'm as a podcaster myself,
I'm wondering like how you guys landed
on that.
>> It really came from um it came from it
being a like this we're like at almost a
thousand episodes and even early on uh
it was always about a 20 20 to 25 minute
occasionally a 30 minute podcast and it
didn't have There were no interviews for
the longest time and once we started
having guests uh the conversations were
just too good. The conversations just we
couldn't get stuff in in 20 minutes and
found and so finally I was like all
right instead of just having like all
sorts of you know going from 20 minutes
to an hour and then maybe back to 20
minutes or anything like that we say you
know what we'll keep it closer to like a
you know a time box of some sort and
then we'll just split them into you know
multiple episodes. And so that's turned
out to be not a bad way to do it too
because then it allows people to just
sort of like uh really to just digest
some of stuff because we tend to have
like this you've got a conversation
where there's a lot of good notes in
there and so I found it's pretty nice to
have like they can take you know that
first half of it think about a little
bit they come back the next episode and
now get hit with you know either
sometimes it's a little bit of a
variance in in what we talk about or
it's like now we get into the more
complicated applications of whatever we
talked about in in the first episode.
So, it's it's really has more to do with
just sort of like time boxing stuff and
keeping more of a consistency in length
as opposed to to anything else.
>> Oh, well no, it's uh that's reasonable.
I'm an outlier. I listen to like two
three hour podcasts. So, uh I uh I do
that like I'll do the Dan Carlin podcast
every six years or whenever it comes
out. But to me, it's like there's a
certain point but because it's an audio
book now. Um, but then I there are a few
like I'll listen to and I'll be like
I'll it's good it's better for long
trips. What with ours with the developer
thing it feels like you know if you're
not in the car all day or something like
that it's easier to just hit this in a
snippet like during lunch or if you've
got like a you know average 30 to 45
minute commute home or something like
that then you can sort of fit it in a
bite-sized chunk as opposed to having to
do it over you know a couple of listens.
>> Cool. Well, hey appreciate the
opportunity. anything I can do for you?
>> Uh, not right now, but definitely I will
reach out to you uh on LinkedIn if I
have not already. I don't think I
haven't. We'll we'll connect and um
yeah, we'll we'll get you that stuff and
just let us know if there's any
questions you have or you anything like
that that we can help out anywhere we
can go. Even if you want to chat about
podcasting approaches and stuff like
that, we're we're happy to do that as
well.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Well, you guys thousand
episodes, you got a lead on me for sure.
I think I'm I'm happy I'm about to crack
75. So, uh yeah,
>> it goes quick. It's amazing how suddenly
I was like, "Wow, it's 100. Wow, it's
500. Wow, it's almost a thou." You know,
it's just like it does like you get into
the rhythm and next thing you know
you're like, "Wow, I have cranked out a
lot of episodes."
>> Wow. Wow. Well, it's impressive. Well,
hey, I appreciate the time. Um, thank
you so much.
>> Sounds good. Have a good one. Take care.
>> Take care. Bye.
>> Take care. Thank you.
Transcript Segments
27.199

Well, hello and welcome back. We are

30.4

here continuing our season of building

32.399

better foundations. We are building

33.92

better developers, the developer

35.36

podcast. I happen to be Rob Broadhead, a

37.84

founder of developer better building

40.16

better developers, also the founder of

42

RB Consulting, where we help you assess

43.68

your technology and build a roadmap to

46.16

success. Good things and bad things.

50.079

I have been good things. I have been

51.84

talking about like technology and cool

53.84

tools and stuff like that recently and

56.559

have found that there are like I said

58.399

there's just a lot of neat things I've

59.84

been able to do that allow me to really

62.64

like embrace digital nomad and all of

66

those kinds of things having a you know

67.84

a virtual office uh being able to have

70.32

conversations with people being able to

71.84

keep in touch and it's it's really been

74.88

awesome. This is a a really good thing.

77.2

Uh I really enjoy it. So this is in the

78.88

plus column. Um the negative column is

83.04

doing so now I have more of a feel like

86

I'm in a studio when I do these things.

87.92

So I have like bright lights on me and

89.68

things like that that drive me a little

92.4

bit nuts or maybe nutser a little bit

95.439

more beyond where I normally my sanity

98.799

level normally lies much like my co-host

101.759

who drives me crazy on a regular basis

103.6

for a wide range of reasons. But go

106.24

ahead and introduce yourself. Hey

107.92

everyone, my name is Michael Malash. I'm

109.2

one of the co-founders of developer

110.72

building better developers. I'm also the

112.56

founder of Envision QA where we build

114.72

and test custom software that helps

116.88

businesses run smoother and grow faster.

119.52

Uh good thing bad thing uh good thing uh

122.399

said technology. Uh I like playing with

125.119

gadgets and that and uh I I love playing

127.36

with those little studio things and

129.28

video uh equipment. Uh bad thing is the

132.48

audio editing tools are a pain in the

135.52

butt. It's like one tool works great for

137.52

one thing, another tool works great for

138.959

another, but unless you pay a lot of

140.879

money, you can't really do it all in

142.48

one. So, it sometimes these edits get a

145.12

little complicated.

147.2

I will say that of the tools that we've

149.36

played around with over the years,

150.8

although I did it manually for a long

152.48

time, uh Adobe's tools were are

155.04

topnotch. Uh although my son who does a

158.08

lot of this would actually argue some of

159.519

those, there are some better tools out

160.8

there now. Uh I found actually descript

163.04

has been a is a really good tool to take

165.2

a look at and it does do uh it has

167.84

progressed very well and very quickly.

169.68

So uh but this is an area where there's

172.4

a lot of change because of AI and stuff

174.48

like that. So I would say check your new

176.56

tools on a regular basis because there

178.16

are cool stuff out there and maybe a

179.92

better price point. All of that being

182.239

said, let us now return to our

184.72

conversation with Dan Boowski and we're

188.239

going to talk more about pricing. And

190.8

yeah, we're going to range far and wide,

193.28

but pencils up because I think you're

195.44

going to want to take notes. There's

196.4

some really good uh areas, even areas

198.48

that we don't dig into necessarily to go

200.64

too deep. Uh but we will have links in

202.64

the show notes and all that kind of good

203.84

stuff for you to check in with Dan at

205.76

another time and see if maybe you can

207.36

have a conversation with him to go

209.2

deeper in those areas. Here we go back

211.519

where we left off in our conversation

213.28

with Dan.

217.68

>> I love that. Um, so I have one more

220.4

question. I'll pass it back to Rob. So

222.4

where do you see in this modern age of

224.72

AI SAS pricing going over the next few

227.519

years?

229.36

>> Oh, big big question.

233.68

>> There's so many different areas to touch

235.92

on here, so I'll try to boil it down to

237.92

a couple.

240.4

I think one thing that we're seeing

242

right now is an incredible amount of

244.72

dynamism in the software pricing space

247.28

that maybe we've not seen for a very

249.439

long time. I think probably the last

251.68

thing it was comparable to was the

253.2

transition from perpetual to SAS models

256

maybe about 15 years ago at this point.

260.88

So, one of the things that's happening

262.8

is that you've seen competitive dynamics

265.36

unlike anything you're ever seeing at

267.52

the sort of foundational model layer.

269.04

And I think there's there's kind of two

271.12

there's multiple battlefronts here,

273.04

which is one of the reasons why it's so

274.4

complicated. If we just focus, for

275.68

example, on say the foundational AI

278.4

model companies,

280.24

you see every week they're oneuping each

282.72

other with a, you know, Anthropic just

284.88

did this, you know, a week or two ago

286.8

when they launched Opus 45. it's now the

289.36

best model and they dropped the price

291.52

right what was you know so you just by

293.919

that alone you could see sort of the

295.84

dynamics uh that are that are happening

298.16

um and so we're seeing constant you know

300.56

iteration and update as folks try to uh

303.28

figure that part out I would say on the

305.199

other side you know where we might talk

307.28

about AI enabled uh software platforms

311.84

so you know every board of directors has

314.08

asked their CEO since the launch of chat

316.08

GBT in late 2022 do what are we doing

318.88

with about AI and we've seen a lot of

321.36

interesting experiments. I don't know

322.72

that anything has you know fully uh you

324.88

know been a home run yet but um so

328.24

everyone is baking AI enabled

330.479

capabilities into their products and so

332

what we're seeing there is a very real

335.84

tension between

338.96

how do we monetize this thing? Is it

340.72

ready to monetize? And how do we manage

344.639

margin? Because software has got to

347.36

exist in a very

350.08

privileged position of world industries

353.52

where, you know, if I sell you hammers,

356.24

I have to care how much it costs me to

358.8

land that hammer manufactured to put it

360.72

into Home Depot. Like, I can't just be

362.72

like, I'll I'll I'll charge you a $150

364.8

per hammer and like I'll figure it out

366.16

on the back end. Like, no, you're not

367.28

going to be in business very long. But

368.96

software companies forever have been

370.479

able to do that.

372.479

There's been some exception but you know

375.039

the marginal cost to serve because

376.88

network storage compute has been almost

378.56

infinite testably small per you know

381.52

incremental user basis that they've been

383.36

able to ignore such things and so now

386

there's a real trade-off that those

387.68

companies are facing. Okay, we're now

390.24

seeing a you know the CFO is seeing a

392.319

giant check every month going out the

394.24

door to OpenAI or Anthropic or to

396.08

Google.

398.16

How are we what are we doing about this?

400.319

And so we're seeing a lot of comp what

402.16

what I think fundamentally is changing

403.68

is that companies are having to look at

405.6

their pricing a lot sooner in their life

408

cycle to account for this. Uh and

410.479

there's many other sort of dynamics I

412.24

could talk about, but I wanted to just

414.08

start there and lay out some uh

416.96

landscape.

418.8

>> Well, I think that that sort of leads

420.639

back to something I wanted to swing back

422.479

around to actually. I guess we'll start

424.96

with this one. Um

427.52

because we you we started off talking

429.68

about like premium and things like that

431.28

and how do you I want to sort of combine

434

wrap this into two questions is how do

435.759

you look at tiered pricing you know like

438.4

the famous like you know bronze silver

440.24

and gold approach uh which to me feels

444.08

similar because there's always like the

445.52

free demo and then bronze silver gold

447.919

that that tend to be out there and then

451.44

>> how how do you see for example these

454.4

like these SAS tools that are out there.

457.28

Um, how do you see that like adjusting

460.639

pricing based on the for example like

464.08

now we're going to have AI as part of

466.4

you know certain tiers or things like

467.919

that and it falls into the same to me it

470

falls in the same categories of things

471.28

like what do you how do you do you

473.36

adjust your pricing based on um you know

476.8

like the monetary flow and things like

479.039

that. if you suddenly have you know

481.039

contraction or expansion or you know

483.12

things like that in in pricing models uh

486.24

because AI is definitely going to be a

487.68

part of that as I think it's it's

489.199

lowering the cost of the technical tools

492.319

in a sense or at least has the

494

opportunity to do that. So how do you

496

see that impacting pricing or how should

498

that factor into the impact of pricing?

501.44

>> Yeah. Um this is a great question. Um so

506.8

a couple different things. So when you

508.879

talk about you know the bronze, silver,

510.72

gold, sometimes folks refer to that as,

513.76

you know, good, better, best. Um the so

517.44

that is one of the ways that we're

519.599

seeing SAS companies monetize today and

521.919

I think it makes a lot of sense in

523.599

certain use cases. So uh the you know

526

example would be uh so I'll use intercom

529.92

because I think they've actually done

531.279

really this really smartly. So, Intercom

533.36

does a lot of things, but one of the

534.56

things worlds they compete in is the

536.48

world of customer service uh agent

538.72

software. So, they compete with like the

540.399

Zenesks of the world um for customer

543.12

support systems. And so, they have a

545.76

platform that has a good, better, best.

547.519

And so one of the things is some of

550

their AI capabilities like summarize the

553.839

entire transaction history with this

555.92

account and all their service tickets or

557.519

the the last you know the history you

559.76

know imagine a service agent gets

562.16

bounced midway through a support

564

experience right and then maybe there's

565.44

a bunch of different notes summarize all

566.88

this so that capability maybe that's in

570.48

the better or best tier to help drive

572.72

upgrade and maybe I leave my tier

575.68

pricing alone at like a price point

577.76

level. But say you know in that case

581.68

customer support software much like CRM

583.68

often priced per user because like how

585.36

many customer support agents do you have

587.04

using the platform uh often translates

590

really nicely to the value you're

591.2

providing and that value is

595.519

that value driver is enhancing that

598.399

agent's ability to be effective be

600.24

higher performance answer tickets

601.92

faster.

603.76

The other reason I'm using intercom is

605.68

because they also did something separate

607.12

which is they created what they call

608.72

their finai which is their automated

612.08

sort of support deflection agent and for

615.36

that they created a entirely separate

618.32

pricing model because

621.12

the value driver there is hey you don't

623.2

need to get any agents involved at all

625.12

this thing sits on your website your

626.48

customers come and have a you know

628.079

intercom's obvious thing that you know

629.279

they they started this a bunch of other

630.399

people copied it but they're sitting on

632.079

the the bottom right corner of your uh

634.079

website, your little chat window pops

636

up. So, hey, if we can answer your

639.68

customer's support questions before they

641.92

ever come to your agent, we'll just

643.279

charge you 99 cents per resolution.

647.2

And there, you're not enhancing the

649.44

value of the customer support agent.

651.279

Instead, you have a different brand new

653.04

value driver where the user is not even

654.48

involved. And so, they separated that

655.92

functionality out.

658.32

I like the way Intercom has done that

660.56

and that structure as well because I'll

662.56

just maybe lay out some bad practices

665.68

that I've seen folks creep into, which

668.64

is, hey, we've got this bill for

674.079

whatever $20,000 a month we're paying to

677.36

OpenAI.

680.32

They're charging us per token. So, we're

683.68

going to add a

687.279

per token usage through our platform

689.76

writer to all of our pricing or we're

693.519

going to add a per token usage limit to

696.48

the problem with that is customers have

698.72

no freaking clue what a token is and

700.56

they don't want to know what a token is.

702.32

Your sales people don't want to know

703.36

what a token is. They definitely don't

704.399

want to have to explain it on a sales

705.839

call because it has nothing to do with

707.519

your product. If you're selling a CRM

708.88

and all of a sudden you're in the world

710

explaining what AI tokens are, like

711.76

you've already lost the battle. Like

713.68

even if you have the best salesperson in

715.279

the world and they have some amazing

716.88

pitch, like you've still gone off the

719.36

rails trying to explain to a customer,

721.76

you've moved from talking about their

723.12

problem, how many sales people have? I

724.8

got 100. Great. It's 10 bucks a user.

726.079

It's 1,000 bucks a month. Awesome. Sign

728.56

me up. Now all of a sudden, now we're

729.92

talking about infrastructure and your

731.92

costs and customers don't give a

733.68

about that. So it's a really bad idea.

736.32

adds sand in the motion. There's sand in

738.32

the gears of your go to market machine.

740.24

So, you know what the Finn AI example I

744.639

like is they were able to, you know, and

747.04

so there's there's permutations, right?

748.88

You you know, if you really believe it's

750.32

driving value, maybe you increase the

751.76

cost of those higher tiers in the in the

753.6

good, better, best model that have the

755.04

AI plans to help, you know, uh cover

757.12

that. Um, but either way, you've left it

760.32

as per user price on those plans and a

762.72

hey 99 cent per resolution, right? We're

766.16

not talking about how hard our AI is got

768.56

to work or we're using Open AI under the

770.48

hood and we got to pay them a bunch of

771.68

money so we're going to charge you some

773.519

approximate cause. It and companies

775.76

should have learned this because they

776.639

had to go through the same thing back in

778

the days of like the Twilio with like

780.079

per SMS because the if you ever looked

781.92

at telecom pricing it's like

784.8

every geography two geography is like

786.959

this giant matrix. Um, and so, you know,

789.839

companies have had to deal with even

791.2

worse before. But, you know, net net is

794

if you're going to try to cap some sort

796.72

of usage metric, make it something that

799.92

your customers are already tracking at

802.24

best or at least is related to what

804.8

they're going to be doing with your

806.16

product in a way that's not tokens.

809.36

>> Do you find God every time we have a

812.24

every question we could expanded like

814

six others? Um, let me say I but this is

818.56

like that's the thing is pricing is can

820.88

be very complicated. Can be very there's

822.8

a there are a lot of factors. I mean

824.8

it's amazing how often we'll have

826.24

somebody that's a consultant type and

827.6

they'll say well the answer will be well

829.279

that depends and pricing it feels like

831.6

is even more so. It's just there's just

833.76

so many nuances and details that can

836.959

that you can use and dials and such to

838.959

to hit. Uh but I want to swing back to

841.76

something that I guess is like getting

842.959

back from the idea of like a to the idea

844.72

of like a startup or product or

846.24

something like that. Um I want to like

848.8

the idea of we talked about like trials

851.04

and trial periods and seven and 14 and

853.279

30 days and stuff like that. One of the

855.279

things I see a lot uh and now I'm seeing

858

even I always saw it in B2B more and now

860.32

I'm seeing in B TOC and uh actually push

863.279

it for my the businesses that I talk

865.279

about is to take advantage of these is

867.44

the idea of demos where instead of a a

870.16

free trial is you really sit down you

872.959

you as a company you have some resources

876.079

dedicated to look we're going to walk

877.68

you through this product particularly I

879.839

think when you get into business

880.959

products like even CRM and things like

882.72

that it's like hey this is we need

885.04

this gets past the support and some of

886.72

those kinds. Let's let us show you how

888.959

this can work for you. And what I want

891.12

to I want to know like how much of that

894.079

you have factored in with some of the

896.32

pricing that you've you know discussions

897.92

you have is that something that actually

900.32

because a question I have is could that

902.079

possibly allow you to offer ask for a

904.639

higher pricing? Does it does it maybe

906.639

convert better or allow you to to have a

909.6

little more of a feel of like this is

911.12

the you know this is the Porsche version

913.76

versus the Kia version of of this

915.839

product?

917.12

>> Yeah. Well, I mean I'm not 100% sure I'm

919.6

tracking your question, but I think you

920.8

know for any

922.8

talk about monetization, you always need

924.639

to think about creating value,

926.72

communicating value, and capturing

928.079

value. So if you think about your demo,

931.839

is is the demo actually effectively

934.079

communicating value? Because if we can't

935.839

communicate it, then you know only a

940.079

consumer's

941.76

perceived value of the product matters

944.32

to their willingness to pay. So you may

947.519

be able to write out a beautiful Excel

950.639

model that shows how we create millions

953.6

of dollars of ROI for you and your

956

company. And

958.8

if customer doesn't believe it, prospect

960.639

doesn't believe it, like that's done no

963.04

work for you, right? Maybe it's real.

964.959

Maybe you're like, "Hey, this is the

966.399

data. You know, we we have thousands of

968.48

customers, but they don't believe it. If

970.639

their perception doesn't change, then

973.519

you haven't influenced, you know, the

975.44

final number, which is their willingness

976.72

to pay." So the question then is just

980.32

have you architected

982.56

uh demo effectively or is there an

985.04

ability to do a free trial? You know,

986.639

like I will I will say 99.9% of the time

991.759

a free trial where I can actually put my

993.6

data in and play around with it myself

995.6

is going to increase my perceived value

997.519

more so than a salesperson sitting on a

999.839

call with me running me through a demo.

1002.079

Because I mean we all know how we are,

1004.8

right? I mean most of us can't even

1006.16

watch a full Netflix without checking

1008.16

our phones, let alone some demo of some

1011.04

business software. Our minds in 20

1012.56

different places versus, oh, I'm

1013.759

hands-on. I'm interactive with this

1015.279

thing. So then the question is if we I

1019.36

want to tie this back though to the idea

1021.68

of these offer configurations or good

1023.44

better best structure. If we've done our

1026.959

jobs well we should be able to say gold

1031.039

silver bronze for each of those who is

1034.079

this for

1035.52

>> we have designed those tiers with a

1038.799

particular customer segment in mind. If

1041.679

we start with that end in mind, it makes

1043.679

this process you're talking about all

1045.439

the more effective. Why? Because we say

1048.64

look the customers in our minds is a

1051.76

hypothesis and we'll tweak and tune as

1053.76

we go along. But we believe this kind of

1055.76

customer has this type of context

1059.12

usually could cap encapsulate that in

1061.28

maybe three to five kind of discovery

1063.44

questions.

1064.96

Those are discovery questions we now

1066.64

enable our sales folks with. based upon

1069.039

their answers, we now have cool, my demo

1072.4

script is aligned to showing them this

1074.32

and at the end I have a tier that's

1076.559

perfectly meant for you with a price

1078

point. So, have we thought about that

1080.64

entire flow of the salesperson sitting

1082.72

on a call saying, "Okay, Mr. Customer,

1086.16

nice to meet you. Tell me a little bit

1087.52

about your business. What about this? Do

1089.2

you guys ever struggle with that?" Oh,

1090.559

that's interesting. You ever struggle

1091.52

with this? Cool. Boom, boom, boom, boom,

1093.28

boom. let me show you how our product

1094.64

solves all those problems through a demo

1097.039

that aligns to the features that are in

1098.96

the tier that you're believe that

1100.559

they're suited to sell and we make that

1102.24

more effective. So I just put that all

1103.76

under are we communicating value

1105.28

effectively.

1106.96

>> Oh that's a that goes back to a comment

1109.2

you made earlier about the because it

1111.52

really is it's like you're the some CEOs

1114.16

will be like well you're leaving money

1115.44

on the table just like anything else.

1116.799

It's like because you're saying no to as

1119.679

soon as you segment anybody, you're now

1122.24

saying no to everybody outside of that

1123.84

segment. And now the interesting

1125.44

question there is when you have those

1126.88

tiers and you say which makes perfect

1129.84

sense is you have now let's say you have

1131.44

three tiers. So you've got these three

1133.44

layer you've got three specific types of

1136

customers essentially three avatars that

1137.84

you're serving. Each product is

1140.08

perfectly suited to them. So when you

1142.16

talk to a CEO or a company or founder

1144.48

about that, do you get push back of the

1146.96

like, okay, we're going after the bronze

1149.12

person or, you know, this is what this

1150.96

looks like, do you get the push back of,

1153.039

but wait, we want to be able to upsell

1155.039

them as well as opposed to and and maybe

1158.4

does that does that muddy the waters or

1161.679

is that actually something that you like

1163.28

say, okay, we're going to target the the

1165.6

we'll call them the lower end or the

1167.039

less, you know, the less margin

1168.559

customer. Should we talk about upselling

1172.16

and and and trying to get them into that

1174.16

higher tier uh you know level or or

1177.84

offering?

1179.039

>> Yeah. Um

1182.16

I used to think that way. Um the I I've

1185.52

I've learned the hard way that you don't

1188.4

get out of a pricing exercise without

1190.16

having that conversation. So you have to

1191.84

frontload it. So we didn't talk about

1193.76

kind of my core model, but it starts

1195.52

with customer segmentation. That's the

1197.84

first step of a pricing exercise because

1201.039

if you don't do that, inevitably you're

1203.84

going to be at the executive review of

1207.52

the new pricing and and invariably this

1210.64

question will come up. Well, this is

1212.48

great, but what about X customer? This

1216.08

won't work for X customer. So, I've

1219.6

learned you want to have that

1221.44

conversation at the beginning. Like have

1224.08

everyone say, "What about X customer?

1226.32

What about Y customer? What about JP

1228

Morgan? Because blah blah blah blah blah

1229.44

blah blah blah, right? Get all that and

1232.4

then help them figure out who are their

1235.76

customer segments and get those defined

1238.32

and then build the pricing and packaging

1240.32

around that as a foundation because if

1242.32

you get to the end and you haven't done

1243.76

that in inevitably it's going to blow up

1245.679

with that qu that line of questioning.

1248.559

That actually is a perfect segue as

1250.799

we're sort of like hitting it like this

1252.88

thing could go like I said we could do a

1254.32

whole season I think just talking about

1255.679

pricing and all these different areas

1257.039

and the different approaches to it and

1258.96

what works and what doesn't. Um so I

1262.159

think right there because we we haven't

1263.6

even talked too much about your model

1265.52

and your approach. we got way off into

1268.88

other places, which is a perfect setup

1271.039

for people that now hopefully they have

1273.039

got a nice teaser of like this is

1275.44

somebody that maybe I should talk to.

1277.039

Maybe this Dan guy knows a couple of

1278.799

things and would be worth reaching out

1280.4

to. And in so doing, what is the best

1283.28

way for them to get a hold of you?

1285.36

>> Yeah. Uh I'm on LinkedIn, Dan Blowski.

1287.52

So folks can reach out to me there. Just

1289.28

let me know you heard me on the podcast

1290.64

so I could separate it from the rest of

1291.919

the random LinkedIn spam. Um or uh you

1295.12

know go to my website productquility.com

1297.84

um there's a way to contact me there. I

1299.44

also try to blog about this stuff uh as

1301.2

often as I I can uh manage try to

1303.679

demystify this uh you know I have got a

1306

lot of scar tissue uh so we'll uh you

1308.159

know happy to happy to share that love

1309.679

and I try to do that through my writing.

1311.36

I also have a podcast called SAS scaling

1313.2

secrets myself where I interview uh

1315.44

scale up B2B SAS CEOs about all the ways

1317.679

that to scale their companies. So folks

1319.28

could find that wherever podcasts are

1320.559

found.

1321.6

>> Awesome. because I think we've got more

1323.2

than a few people in the audience that

1324.559

have that seems to be like the that

1326.64

seems to be the

1328.64

one of the more popular ways to launch

1330.4

products these days. People look at it

1331.76

and realize like I don't want to I don't

1333.2

want to do a desktop install or I don't

1334.96

want to do a a website necessarily

1336.72

that's not going to have that that

1338.96

stickiness that SAS tends to. So

1341.36

definitely you guys can check that

1342.559

podcast out. There will be links in the

1344

show notes for sure for all of this. And

1347.36

that will wrap this one up. Uh, I want

1349.919

to thank you so much, Dan, for hanging

1351.44

out with us and having this conversation

1353.36

and allowing it to go all over the place

1356.24

as conversations sometimes do. But

1358.88

that's sort of the messy part, I think,

1360.64

of pricing and products and, uh, it gets

1363.6

back to like this goes back something we

1364.799

talk about so often is the why is it's

1366.559

like who's your customer, who are you

1368

serving, what is the problem you're

1369.76

solving, and does the solution also

1372.24

actually solve the problem in a way that

1374.64

people are like, "Yes, take my money."

1377.12

Uh, so you always want to find those

1378.48

people that are on the desert and you're

1379.919

selling them a bottle of water as

1381.36

opposed to the people that have just

1382.559

gotten out of, you know, just walked off

1384.4

a boat where they about drowned and now

1386

you're like, "Hey, would you like a

1387.12

little more water on top of that?"

1389.28

>> So, thank you so much for your time. I

1390.799

appreciate you hanging out with us, Dan.

1392.64

>> Thanks for having me. It's fun.

1394.48

>> All right. And for all the rest of you,

1396.64

uh, check us out in the show notes and

1398.799

the the links there for him. And if you

1400.96

leave any comments for us, we will pass

1402.4

those on. Or reach out to him directly.

1404.159

It'll be that much easier. Uh go out

1406.159

there and have yourselves a great day, a

1408.08

great week, and we will talk to you next

1411.039

time.

1412.559

Uh let's see. So, we do a a video as

1415.44

well and we have a bonus. So, uh I love

1418.32

for the the interviews. It's like what

1420.159

would be one somebody comes to you and

1422.559

says, "I've got a product. I need to

1424.88

figure out pricing." What would be like

1427.44

and I don't know where to begin. What

1428.96

would be like a first step that you say

1430.72

this is where you should begin with your

1432.96

your pricing journey?

1435.84

Um

1437.52

well uh I would say two things. Uh I

1440.48

actually have a uh a SAS CEO pricing

1443.76

scorecard on my website. So that's a

1445.84

good uh sort of a self assessment and

1448.159

then there's some prescriptive tips for

1451.2

uh helping through different scenarios

1453.12

because as we've talked about pricing

1454.96

can cover a lot of ground whether that's

1456.88

governance nobody owns pricing that's a

1458.799

problem or or discounting is all over

1460.559

map that's a problem right or you know

1462.32

more of the strategic pricing

1463.6

considerations that we discussed on on

1465.44

the show um you know I'd say areas of of

1468.24

highest leverage you know for folks just

1470.08

getting started is one thing I've

1472

learned is there's a difference between

1474.4

having a discounting policy and

1476.48

enforcing a discounting policy and you

1478.32

want to make sure you're doing both. Um

1480.159

because that's at the front end, right?

1482.08

If we think about the your developer

1484.48

audience will understand APIs, you know,

1486.4

that's the API for your pricing, right?

1488.559

So, we could have some beautiful

1490.48

strategic pricing that in the boardroom

1492.32

looked amazing on PowerPoint, uh but

1494.4

your sales folks just do whatever they

1496.24

want. The market's never going to know

1497.6

about that beautiful pricing. So, it's

1499.2

usually a really good first step for

1500.96

folks to say, do we have a price a

1503.44

discounting policy and are we actually

1505.039

enforcing and monitoring and tuning that

1506.64

over time? Um, so I think that's a

1508.32

really good tactical first place to stop

1510.24

start. Uh, because we go do a bunch of

1512.72

really cool strategic work in the

1514.96

boardroom and if we launch it, we're not

1517.279

going to see as much impact. Oh, that's

1519.84

a that's a cl I've got I've got

1521.84

nightmare horror stories in my past of

1524

companies where the the salespeople were

1526.08

able to pretty much just do whatever

1527.76

pricing wise and they ended up into all

1530.08

they had all kinds of issues with that

1531.44

as far as like some things were not even

1533.12

profitable. Uh and then trying to

1535.679

actually like when they tried to

1537.039

standardize it, it was a nightmare

1539.2

because everybody was like I've got a

1540.799

10-year contract with this thing like oh

1543.2

that's not going to work. We're going

1544.08

have to find a way to you know reset

1545.84

that. And people aren't happy when

1547.44

they've already like budgeted that out.

1550.64

All right. Well, we'll let you get back

1551.919

to your day. Thanks for hanging out.

1553.52

Thanks for the bonus. Uh actually, I

1555.2

guess two little bonus points there. And

1557.2

we will uh we'll get this out. This will

1559.279

be coming out. I think we're like at

1561.36

late January now, somewhere around

1563.44

there.

1564.159

>> Think we're in February now.

1565.76

>> Early February. Uh we'll do it'll be a

1568

two-parter. So, it'll be a Tuesday and a

1569.6

Thursday. And as we get closer to those

1571.36

links and have those available, we will

1572.88

send them out and allow you to share

1574.96

those out.

1575.44

>> Just out of out of out of curiosity, why

1577.12

why do you do two-parters? I don't care.

1579.2

I just like I'm as a podcaster myself,

1581.679

I'm wondering like how you guys landed

1583.76

on that.

1584.48

>> It really came from um it came from it

1587.36

being a like this we're like at almost a

1590.08

thousand episodes and even early on uh

1592.88

it was always about a 20 20 to 25 minute

1595.84

occasionally a 30 minute podcast and it

1598.96

didn't have There were no interviews for

1600.96

the longest time and once we started

1602.24

having guests uh the conversations were

1605.12

just too good. The conversations just we

1607.84

couldn't get stuff in in 20 minutes and

1610.24

found and so finally I was like all

1613.12

right instead of just having like all

1615.52

sorts of you know going from 20 minutes

1617.36

to an hour and then maybe back to 20

1619.039

minutes or anything like that we say you

1620.159

know what we'll keep it closer to like a

1622.799

you know a time box of some sort and

1625.039

then we'll just split them into you know

1626.799

multiple episodes. And so that's turned

1629.679

out to be not a bad way to do it too

1632

because then it allows people to just

1633.44

sort of like uh really to just digest

1636.96

some of stuff because we tend to have

1638.799

like this you've got a conversation

1640.4

where there's a lot of good notes in

1642.159

there and so I found it's pretty nice to

1644.24

have like they can take you know that

1645.84

first half of it think about a little

1647.919

bit they come back the next episode and

1649.52

now get hit with you know either

1651.279

sometimes it's a little bit of a

1652.559

variance in in what we talk about or

1654.88

it's like now we get into the more

1656.559

complicated applications of whatever we

1658.72

talked about in in the first episode.

1660.559

So, it's it's really has more to do with

1663.279

just sort of like time boxing stuff and

1664.96

keeping more of a consistency in length

1667.44

as opposed to to anything else.

1669.679

>> Oh, well no, it's uh that's reasonable.

1671.6

I'm an outlier. I listen to like two

1673.279

three hour podcasts. So, uh I uh I do

1676.399

that like I'll do the Dan Carlin podcast

1678.559

every six years or whenever it comes

1679.919

out. But to me, it's like there's a

1681.039

certain point but because it's an audio

1682.399

book now. Um, but then I there are a few

1685.279

like I'll listen to and I'll be like

1687.679

I'll it's good it's better for long

1689.6

trips. What with ours with the developer

1692.08

thing it feels like you know if you're

1693.279

not in the car all day or something like

1694.64

that it's easier to just hit this in a

1697.039

snippet like during lunch or if you've

1699.52

got like a you know average 30 to 45

1701.52

minute commute home or something like

1702.799

that then you can sort of fit it in a

1704.159

bite-sized chunk as opposed to having to

1706.72

do it over you know a couple of listens.

1709.679

>> Cool. Well, hey appreciate the

1711.12

opportunity. anything I can do for you?

1713.2

>> Uh, not right now, but definitely I will

1715.76

reach out to you uh on LinkedIn if I

1717.84

have not already. I don't think I

1718.96

haven't. We'll we'll connect and um

1721.6

yeah, we'll we'll get you that stuff and

1723.279

just let us know if there's any

1724.32

questions you have or you anything like

1726.159

that that we can help out anywhere we

1727.679

can go. Even if you want to chat about

1729.76

podcasting approaches and stuff like

1731.6

that, we're we're happy to do that as

1733.12

well.

1733.44

>> Yeah. Yeah. Well, you guys thousand

1734.88

episodes, you got a lead on me for sure.

1736.48

I think I'm I'm happy I'm about to crack

1738.159

75. So, uh yeah,

1740.08

>> it goes quick. It's amazing how suddenly

1741.919

I was like, "Wow, it's 100. Wow, it's

1743.919

500. Wow, it's almost a thou." You know,

1746.08

it's just like it does like you get into

1748.08

the rhythm and next thing you know

1749.36

you're like, "Wow, I have cranked out a

1750.799

lot of episodes."

1751.919

>> Wow. Wow. Well, it's impressive. Well,

1754

hey, I appreciate the time. Um, thank

1756.399

you so much.

1757.36

>> Sounds good. Have a good one. Take care.

1759.039

>> Take care. Bye.

1760

>> Take care. Thank you.