πŸ“Ί Develpreneur YouTube Episode

Video + transcript

Trust and Reliability Matter: Interview with Adam Malone (Part 2)

2025-10-09 β€’Youtube

Detailed Notes

In this episode of Building Better Developers (S26E04), hosts Rob Broadhead and Michael Meloche continue their conversation with Adam Malone on how trust and reliability shape successful teams and lasting customer relationships.

Adam explains how consistency, empathy, authenticity, and performance define reliability β€” and how revisiting your principles keeps teams aligned and customers confident. Learn why early, honest communication builds stronger foundations and how shared ownership transforms every part of the customer journey.

πŸ”— Read the full blog post: https://develpreneur.com/trust-and-reliability-matter-interview-with-adam-malone-part-2/

*Connect with Adam Malone*

If you enjoyed this conversation and want to learn more from Adam, he’s always open to sharing insights and connecting with like-minded professionals.

LinkedIn: Adam Malone on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/adammalone-speaks/ Website: http://thetenaciousoperator.com/

Visit him on LinkedIn and drop him a message to continue the discussion around leadership, reliability, and building consistent customer experiences.

*Connect with us:* 🌐 Michael Meloche | Envision QA | https://envisionqa.com/ 🌐 Rob Broadhead | RB Consulting | https://rb-sns.com/

#BuildingBetterDevelopers #Trust #Reliability #Leadership #Teamwork #CustomerExperience

Transcript Text
[Music]
Well, hello and welcome back. We are
able to breathe again. We've been
holding our breath since the last
episode. We're going to get into part
two of our interview with Adam Malone as
we continue our season on building
better foundations. But first, I am Rob
Broadhead, one of the founders of
Developer, also the founder of RB
Consulting, where we help you do
technology better. We sit down with you.
We help you assess where you are at,
where your business is at, not only
today, but also like what are your
plans? What are your visions? What are
your goals? And then we help you create
a roadmap to utilize technology better
than you're doing it today, but also to
position you for tomorrow so that you
have a road map for success that either
you can execute or you can team with us
uh will help you out as needed to
execute along the way, even completely
executing it for you if needed. Check us
out at rb-sns.com.
Uh you can also do a really quick and
quick and free assessment kind of thing
to get some advice at matrix mat r
ix.rb-sns.com
and check us out there. Uh good thing,
bad thing.
Uh good thing is uh so we're continuing
this uh uh working on a house that was
its own little good thing, bad thing.
And in doing so, uh it's like it's the
fun things that you have. So, we're
redoing some floors and a good thing is
one of them was like and it's lenolium
and it was laid out not terribly well
and it was pretty beat up but ripping it
up was super simple. It was like
basically you just like you know a
little hammer, a little nail, some stuff
like that, a little screwdriver to pry
some stuff up and then just lift and you
know a couple of minutes later and a few
you know not even very bad cuss words
and it's like everything's up and we're
ready to go. Uh the bad news is that we
did have one of the three rooms that was
we're not so lucky that the glue was
done differently and stuff like that. So
um I'm gonna have a lot of gun time with
a heat gun for a little bit as I'm
slowly like peeling my way through floor
for the next uh next little bit here. So
not the funnest thing. Hopefully more
not it will be much more fun to listen
to Michael and his introduction than
playing around with a heat gun. But you
never know. I guess it depends on how
much of a gadget person you are. Go a
introduce yourself.
>> Hey everyone, my name is Michael Malash.
I'm one of the founders of Building
Better Developers, also known as
Developer. I'm also the owner of
Envision QA, where we build custom
software that helps businesses owners
take back control of their operations
with a strong focus on service
reliability and long-term success. From
streaming to workflows to replacing
outdated systems, we create tools
tailored to your business. And we don't
stop there. We uh back everything
through testing and quality checks to
make sure it works right the first time.
Check us out at Envision QA where we
combine great software with great
support so you can run your business
with confidence. Uh good thing, bad
thing. Uh I guess uh good thing I've had
a little bit of kind of downtime. I've
been running some testing on software
and that which takes time and ties up my
computer. So, I've decided to clean my
office and well, I I've made lots of
progress in here. Uh the good thing is
I've eliminated probably two uh mini
bookshelves or a full bookshelf if you
got a big tall bookcase. Uh bad thing,
my office is completely trashed at the
moment. So, I'm I'm got to clean that up
next. But, uh hey, making progress.
And here we go. We're going to dive
right back into part two of our
conversation with Adam Malone. We're
talking about trust and building it and
how it impacts projects, teams, and all
that kind of goodness. So, here we go.
Picking up almost exactly right where we
left off.
>> So,
you know, we've been talking about
principles and you talked about just
now, you know, having the VP and the PMs
and that and breaking it out. As you go
through the process of working with the
all the players and you define these
principles, how often do you feel that
you need to go back and revisit the
principles to make sure that they're not
stale, that you're on track, and that
everyone continues to have the same
buyin for the project.
>> Um,
I would make them a touch point at
nearly every, you know, depending how
you run your projects. um you know not
daily but the the meetings where you're
reading out on status and that you're
especially kind of hashing through an
issue that you're having um they need to
start with this uh and ideally you've
you've codified these enough that they
are maybe one or two PowerPoint slides
and that you can say hey guys we are
here today uh because we have some
contention about how we handle this
business requirement.
Well, part of the reason that we are in
contention is
we don't all agree how that ties into
the principles we set out at the
beginning. As a reminder, here are the
principles that we agreed to for making
these decisions. Now, here's the
business requirement that we're trying
to work through and the solution. Bob,
you you cited that you were concerned
that we might not deliver against the
principles because of that. Can you
explain that? Yeah. Okay. And then you
actually ask people, hey, does everyone
agree with Bob? like can we all agree
that that the risk that he's cited would
violate the principles we've agreed to
because sometimes this is helping some a
member of the team see like hey you're
concerned about a risk that we've solved
for elsewhere right um and then also
saying does anyone else feel this way is
anyone else concerned about this as well
and having that conversation but um I
mean to put a timeline on it I would say
these should be in front of the team
almost every two weeks or so. Um, even
if it's just a, hey, this is our
bi-weekly readout. As we mentioned, here
are the five ways we're making the
decisions around here on this. Does
anyone have any concerns about those as
we kind of have learned more over the
last two weeks?
And 90% of the time, it's going to be
really annoying because no one has
anything to say. And you're going to be
like, why did we even spend five minutes
on this?
But it's that one time that someone
says,
"Hey,
when I was doing XYZ thing on that
business requirement, that's not how I
built it or that's not how the
development team is working on that or
that's not how the operations team is
going to deploy that because that's what
you have happen, right? Is the tech team
goes and does stuff and then the
operations team goes and does stuff of
like how they're going to operationally
handle the outcome of what the system
tells them frequently. and we don't like
go revisit those enough. And so that's
that's part of why I'm saying it's
helpful to look at them regularly and
also helpful to have the different views
from the team in there to say, "Oh, this
doesn't actually meet what I just built
with my team." Um, and get and make it
acceptable for people to say that.
They're not going to get in trouble when
they say that.
>> Now, with these principles, I I know
you're talking, you know, within your
team, within the products. Um,
have you defined or have you ever worked
out principles with dealing with the
customer like the end goal within these
principles or within different teams?
Um, just kind of curious how you handle
that or what your thought process is on
putting that together with a team that
may never have worked with something
like that.
>> Yeah. So definitely have and that can
that has involved everything from hey we
have a replacement strategy for how we
want to handle a customer who complains
about their product for example and
again if you say well we just want to
deliver the best customer experience
possible well that's going to mean that
you just give that customer a bunch of
either money directly or you you know
give them a Cadillac when they bought a
Kia. Um, and so helping people to to
really codify,
yes, we want a great customer
experience. What does that look like
when someone says, "Hey, I have a
product return as an example."
Okay, here's how we define as a group
what that should look like. Um, so
there's going to be some process
discussion. How do we treat the
customer?
What documentation do we ask for from
them? Are we going to require them to
return their product to us before we
give them a replacement product? All of
those things need to be discussed and
thought of through the lens of we want a
great customer experience, but we can't
break the bank and we have to be able to
deliver it in a reasonable time frame,
right? Um, and so defining those, here's
what we want that to look like, and then
really
meeting on them and being open to people
saying, "I don't like I don't think
we're delivering what we want or ideally
reviewing, especially if it's an
exception like a return or something
like that." Those likely happen
infrequently enough that you can bring
the team back and do afteraction reviews
and say like, "Hey, Michael called in.
He had a return. Let's walk through how
that return went for Michael." And then
we're going to like at the end everybody
raise your hand if you think we did the
right thing for Michael or if you think
we didn't do the right thing for
Michael, right? And and then you can
start to build group consensus on, you
know, I don't actually think we treated
him the way we all wanted to treat him
based on what we said the principles
are. Okay, then what do we need to go
fix and change? Um, but but too often we
can accidentally act like, well, if it's
a customer thing, the customer
experience team or the customer support
team needs to be involved and like the
rest of us kind of don't need to be
aware of it. Um,
or if it's a supply chain thing, hey, we
don't want anyone to come talk to us.
Like, we'll do a good job, you know,
shipping product out, but kind of stay
out of our business. drop the order to
the ERP and we'll handle it from there.
Well, we need every group to be okay
having those conversations about the
customer and the customer experience
um
in a way that we may tell each other
that the the baby's ugly and
and we all have to own again back to the
commit concept. We all have to own that
it's our baby. It's not Michael's baby
and Rob's baby or Adam's baby or
customer solutions baby or supply
chain's baby. This is what we all agreed
to build. So, we're not indicting anyone
when we say it's not delivering what we
want. We're if anyone's being indicted,
we're all in it together. We're not kind
of pointing fingers and throwing people
under the bus. I'm sorry I rambled a bit
there, Michael, but
>> Oh, that's great. I I kind of have a
follow-up to that. I kind of want to
flip that now. So we've talked talked a
lot about you know your team and
internally. So how do you build that
trust using the same kind of model with
your customer?
>> Okay. So um the trust is built on three
components and actually try not to say
build trust but we'll take that for
another time. Um there's three
components of trust. Uh
these are empathy,
authenticity and performance. And so
when someone chooses to give us their
trust, we have delivered on their need
to feel empathy,
to feel that we are being authentic and
to feel that we will deliver on our
performance or our commitments, right?
And so we are our goal is to the
language I like I want to inspire
Michael to give me his trust.
I don't get to build trust because it's
not permanent and I don't get to decide
when you trust me. I can invest in each
of those components of trust such that
you're inspired enough to give your
trust to me. So first I would try to use
that language of how do we inspire our
customers to trust us? And I would look
at each of those buckets. So empathy is
when someone feels like they are seen
and cared for. Um
uh here's an example of that. Um, have
you ever have you ever called into like
a call center because you had an issue
and um the call center rep just said
like, "Well, I'm sorry. We can't do
that."
And you How does that feel like when
they just kind of flatly tell you like,
"I'm sorry. That's not how it works. We
can't do that for you." Does that feel
good? You feel seen?
>> No. It's frustrating.
>> No, it's so frustrating.
And and so like what you can see is and
this can't be fake. That's going to be
on the authenticity piece. But on the
empathy piece, there are little cues
that can be so helpful in developing and
showing empathy to your customer. Hey,
Michael, I've heard your concern. I want
to make certain I understand it. You
said that this was the part of your
Dyson vacuum cleaner that wasn't
working. Did I get that right? Yeah.
Yeah, you did. You did. You got that
right. Okay. And I also heard you say X
is is did I understand that right as
well? Yes, it is. Okay. Can you help
tell me h how you would want this how
you want us to handle this for you or
what would solve this problem for you?
Well, all of a sudden the customer has
felt seen on what's going wrong. They
felt seen on kind of what their concern
was and now they've been engaged
potentially on well here's here are some
things I would like to do. You're going
to have lots of people that listen to
this to say like, "Well, you should
never ask a customer that." Um, but I'll
tell you, lots of times you'll find that
people actually want far less than you
think they do. They just want a new knob
for their vacuum cleaner or something.
Um, and so sometimes there can be a lot
of power in asking because you'll find
that there's a bunch of people that you
can just solve their problems outright
for them and it's way less than you
thought when you were going to build a
standard response. The second piece is
after that is you can say let me go let
me let me go review that for you right
let me go compare that and even if it's
just 10 seconds or 5 seconds where you
go and you kind of work on that and you
need to be authentic like I said but
that doesn't mean you know you have to
like go run it up to the CEO right but
can you can you display empathy and that
Michael's got a problem and he wants to
feel like someone actually tried to work
on it and didn't just look at a matrix
on a screen and go, "Sorry, I can't help
you with that." Right?
Um, so, so developing empathy is one,
showing authenticity is the second, and
authenticity is, do I think I'm getting
the real you? And so, when you're
engaging with a customer, the times
where they feel like they're not getting
the real you, that could be as simple as
tone of voice. Um, thank you for calling
AT&T.
Um, or you know, I've called Comcast a
couple times. You know, thanks for
reaching Comcast. It's a pleasure to
serve you. It's like,
I don't think so, bud. Like, we we're
starting this out in the wrong place.
But how often do we all have engagements
like that with like external customers
or even customers within our own company
that way of where we're just kind of
like reading from a script uh in our
actions and it doesn't even feel like
we're trying to be real. Well, we need
to show people that we authentically
care about them and their problem and
that they're seeing the real us. Um and
then finally on performance
um that's about do you have the skills
to help me with this problem
and then will you do so reliably?
Performance breaks really carefully or
easily into performance or capability
versus reliability.
Um and so we can improve people's
perceptions of our performance by
focusing on both of those. Hey, um,
again using the Dyson vacuum example.
Hey, miss, you know, Michael, um, we do
have the part that you want in stock. I
have allocated that part. It's it's on
order for you and your name is attached
to that order and you will get a
whatever a confirmation code in your
email in the next 10 minutes telling you
that that that part is on the way.
Right? So, you kind of you establish I
have the thing. I know what to do with
the thing. and here's a way that you can
test my reliability because I've told
you, hey, in 10 minutes or 30 minutes or
an hour, you're going to get an email
confirming your order. And so now you
can expect that email. And when you get
that email, all of a sudden, that's a
confirmation point that I delivered on
my performance. Um, and I think a a lot
of the time that we fail with internal
and external customers is we don't
invest enough time and displaying
um that we're going to be reliable. Um,
but and reliability is actually a huge
part of people's perception of
performance. And so you can actually do
yourself a disservice
if you ignore those things. If your
system has a gate that when it goes
through people get notified, tell them
about that. Your system is going to do
it no matter what. But now when people
see that happen, they're not like, "Oh
my gosh, Rob sends me an email every 10
minutes." No, they're going to say, "Oh,
Rob told me that when my project kind of
got through this stage gate, I would get
an email or I would get a note. I got
that note. Not only did Rob do what he
said, but I feel good about the fact
that my project moved forward or my
shipment has come here or whatever." Um,
and so using concepts like stage gates,
even if they're to reinforce
communication patterns, can really help
develop trust in ways that are very low
cost,
often they only cost us communication,
which is nearly free.
>> Nice. Now,
do you ever combine the two? So you have
like your internal trust, your internal
meetings kind of defining what you're
doing. You have your customer experience
and that do you ever uh how do you
combine the two processes so that you
know that your customer expectations and
your internal expectations are kind of
in line with each other?
>> Yeah. So a lot of my experience has been
in um regulated products like insurance
products and so sometimes like you
literally have compliance departments
that are supposed to help you make sure
you do that. Um,
and both of you smiled real big when I
said that. Um, and I would say part of
the benefit that you can do is if you
can help people see the value of that
compliance department as opposed to, uh,
the compliance people are here again to
harass us. Instead, saying, hey, these
are some of the few people in the
business that see everything end to end.
They can really help us inspect and
understand what's going on. Um that's
one way uh is through compliance. Um
again I've dealt with a lot of physical
products. So um I like to think of what
we often called an outofbox experience.
Um, and that was something like we would
process an order and we would document
all of that, whether it was screenshots
or recordings or or whatever. And then
when that physical product was
delivered, we would document that. And
then that physical product would like be
opened in a conference room with people
around the box saying things like, "Oh,
like what is the experience like when
you were opening that tab? Is that what
we want for our customers? When I open
the box, what is the first thing I see?
Oh, like the first thing I see isn't
very appealing or interesting. Okay.
Well, I need to change that. Right? But
bringing in a broad set of people to see
the outcome of the work and then inspect
like the process that got your customer
there can really help you unite like
front of office customer experience type
people with operational and technology
delivery people to say hey we all
delivered this product to the customer.
It took all of us to get here. What did
that feel like through the entire
journey? How can I show that to you as a
customer journey and get as tangible as
possible with it? Screenshots, videos,
voice recordings, and then if you have
something where there's a tangible
physical product, if it can be opened
like in a room with people huddled
around it, like invest the time to fly
people in and do that. Um, it is highly
valuable and I think it's one of those
places again that we can sometimes
get a little cheap and we'll say like,
well, I don't want to pay the travel
budget or take people off the phones or
get people off their computers to to do
the dev work. So, we'll just have the
leaders do it. We'll just have the VPs
sit around and do this or something.
That's the wrong way to do it. You need
to bring as many people as possible that
are scattered throughout the process to
experience that stuff. Um, and some of
that gets back to that concept of gimba
that I'm talking about. But the the
every single process in your company,
there is a supplier
um and there is a receiver.
And um the more you can bring those
people together to look at processes end
to end um the better off you'll be in
understanding the customer and
understanding internal needs and in
understanding the output.
Well, after uh really appreciate your
time and you know, giving us a lot of
great insights. So, and I'm sure a lot
of the the audiences out there
applauding as well and saying, "Yeah,
great time. It's standing ovation and
stuff like that." What's the best way
for people to get a hold of you if
they're like, "I would really I think my
team needs some help. I think I'd love
Adam's help." What's the best way to get
a hold of you?
>> Oh, I appreciate that question. Uh the
best way is uh just go to LinkedIn and
search Adam Malone. Uh there's a black
and white photo of a bearded pudgy white
guy with a microphone. That's me. Uh
click on that and send me a message. Uh
I love to hear from people. Um and and
whether that's you just want to kind of
toss around, you know, an issue like
this, you want someone to talk about it,
I'd love to, you know, give you 45
minutes and and do that sort of thing.
It's it's the sort of thing I I enjoy
doing. Um so I would love to hear from
your listeners.
>> Excellent. Well, and I'm sure they would
love to like us, you know, a lot of
great conversations around this. It's a
it's and they're the kinds of
conversations too that I think you walk
away from and you sort of think like I
wonder how I can apply this a little bit
better and you know in this situation
I'm running into or that situation or
you know this person that I've been
butting heads with things of that
nature. So this is great value. Uh like
I said, this has been perfect for us
talking about like the foundations kind
of, you know, of how do you really, you
know, set yourself up for success moving
forward. And one of them is, you know,
like we talked about even like at the
beginning getting those things in place
and and being clear and a few less
assumptions and a few more, you know,
maybe even some some tough discussions,
but you know, going through those things
to make sure that we even if we're not
on the same page, that we agree whatever
page we're on and we can we can move
forward from there.
Yeah.
>> Yeah. I think uh your call out there is
really important that um we're we're
going to have the argument one way or
the other. And I think that's often why
people shy away from a lot of the things
we've talked about is they feel like it
is conflict and argumentative and we're
all going to not like each other. But in
my experience, the argument is the
disagreement is going to come to light
at some point. And if it doesn't,
failure is even more certain. But most
of the time, that disagreement is going
to come to light eventually.
And just like, you know, just like fish,
it doesn't get better with age. Like the
earlier you have those discussions and
those debates, um, the better off you'll
be over the long term. Um, or you can
like leave the fish in the back of the
cabinet and, you know, it'll stink when
you get there in two or 3 weeks or two
or 3 months, right? Um, and the the
fight is bigger and harder and worse
than it was before. Um, so yeah, working
through those early and often is almost
always better. Excellent.
I think that's a great place for us to
wrap this one up. Well, thank you so
much for your time and for hanging out
with for us for a while. Uh it's been a
great conversation. Uh a lot of great
ideas going forward from here. So, I'm
going to take some of this and be
chewing on it mentally for a while as
well. Uh you guys have we will have show
uh links in the show notes to reach out
and uh check out check in with Adam and
ask your own questions and maybe have a
little conversation as well. And uh
hopefully we will uh you know we'll bump
into you again sometime soon and uh you
know appreciate your time. Appreciate
you coming out here and hopefully we'll
be able to continue to have some great
trust conversations as we move forward.
>> Thanks guys. It's been a pleasure.
>> All right. Thanks a lot.
>> Thank you.
>> And that will wrap this up. So this was
a great time with Adam. I want to thank
him again so much. We've thanked him
ausively hopefully affusively enough. Uh
it was great. It's been a while since
we've done a an interview. I really
appreciate him stepping in and doing
that. Uh, and it was a great
conversation as I think you guys know if
you guys so often if you guys got half
out of it what I did then I'm sure that
it was more than worth your while. Um,
we will have l as I mentioned we will
have links to to reach out to him if you
have questions or if you want to have
some conversations. Great guy. Uh, I've
had a couple conversations with him in
the past and I think you can get a lot
out of it. And uh if you're, you know,
if your company's struggling with some
stuff, then uh he's definitely that kind
of guy that you want to point the right
people to and have them come in and
maybe straighten a few people out and
get your team back on track, get the
train back on the rails.
That being said, it is that time where I
have to ask you for an email. Send me an
email at [email protected], but more
importantly, give us feedback however it
is you can give us feedback. Whether
that is leaving us a review and and some
comment text on wherever you do
podcasts. You can do it out on YouTube
at the developer channel. You can we
have a contact us form on the
developer.com site. You can leave
comments on any of our blog posts over
the last several years. Uh you can also
leave us something. Send us something at
xdevelopure
uh Facebook page. We're out there as
well. And someday we'll probably add
some additional sites as well. Uh but
for now, all of those places are great
ways and positive or negative, we want
to get your feedback because that is
what helps us grow. We're going to let
you guys uh dive back into whatever it
is you're doing, becoming better,
building that better foundation,
becoming better developers, and we will
return next episode most likely back on
topic. But uh we'll see whether we
decide to throw another curveball and
get another interview in there. We are
going to mix it up a little bit in this
season of Foundations. Uh but there are
a lot of areas for us to cover uh to
help you build that better foundation so
that you're ready to go and you know
you're ready to take advantage of
whatever your career in life throws at
you. As always we appreciate appreciate
you guys so much. Have yourself a great
day, a great week and we will talk to
you next time
and bonus material. Um so we've got like
a little mix and match stuff. we had
some bonus material at the start of last
one basically and then just sort of a
quick wrap-up. Um I guess bonus would be
just like what are your thoughts? How do
you what are like maybe is there what's
a good takeaway? Let's like what's the
takeaway that you had from the
conversation with Adam?
>> So it's interesting because I take it
he's in a product based like a physical
product based uh industry with a lot of
the discussions he was talking about
with the trust in principles and things
of that nature. It it was just very
interesting how a lot of it follows like
the agile principles with software
development if we actually follow agile
correctly and we do our sprints right
where you can have those discussions to
reinstill the trust. Uh a lot of what I
was hearing really reflected you know
defining the definition of done what is
done which is uh you know kind of his
whole guidelines those principles he was
talking about. Um, I just thought it was
a wellrounded
uh discussion with them. He had a lot of
uh knowledge and information that was
really great for him to share with us.
Yeah, I think that um it's a little
scary and I had this the first time I
talked to him as well is when you have
the
um I don't know what it's called, but
it's basically the you know, we'll call
it the, you know, the nodding head
syndrome or the yes man syndrome or
something like that where everybody's
just sort of like, "Yeah, it's going
well and all's going good."
Um, I've had that in more than a few
places where, you know, you get into and
even with daily standups where people
just get into like this rhythm of, "Yep,
this is what I'm doing. Yeah, it's fine.
Everything's good. Every, you know, it's
sunshine and roses. Let's just keep
marching on as opposed to, you know,
having and a lot of times it is like if
it's an agile, it's the scrum masters
probably should be doing that stuff like
that." It's just somebody sort of that's
rocking the boat a little bit to say,
"Hey, is it really?" You know, it's just
like when you pass somebody on the
street a lot of times like, "Hey, how
you doing?" They're like, "It's great.
It's fine."
Sometimes it's useful to come back and
say, "Really? Is it really fine or are
you just saying that?" And I think we
that is something that even although I
agree, I think agile helps us break it
up. We have a lot of if you do it right,
at least at each sprint, you have the
retrospective and the review and you
have like a really good
point, you know, stopping and uh true up
point kind of thing, you know, a gut
check of, okay, well, let's talk about
this. Where are we going? How are we
doing? So, you don't get too far into
it. But I do think that that is
something again that you have to be
aware of is that like you have to make
sure that when you get into those
retrospectives that people are being you
know a part of that that they are acting
that they are bringing in you know
positives and negatives and stuff like
that. You don't want to have them turn
into just like a big kumbaya thing and
everything's awesome and we all love
everything. you. It's, you know, it's
almost in a lot of places that's just
like you have to come up with two things
we can do better or two things that you
don't like or two things that we need to
stop doing or something like that. Just
you give people an assignment so they
have to figure something out. If they
really struggle because you're so
perfect in your software development
group or whatever, then great. But
usually something's going to come up.
And usually when you get a team, there's
going to be more than one person that's
going to hit on those, which is going to
help you get to, you know, the truth of
it all. And it's, you know, it really is
worth, I think, as a final
recommendation, I would just say it's
worth it to everybody to go spend a
little bit of time understanding how we
screw with ourselves mentally. Um, the
uh loser think by Scott Adams I have
recommended many times. I continue to do
so because it is it is not a light read.
I mean, yes, he did Dilbert and he's got
some Dilbert cartoons in there, but it
is um it will make you think. Uh and
it's I think that's the purpose and it
will make you it will point out some of
the things that uh you need to be
worried about when you are thinking and
how we confuse and and fool ourselves.
And if you just look at like um I would
even say just do like a Google search or
ask you know your favorite AI chatbot
about
um ways that we fool ourselves mental
issues that we don't realize we have uh
things like you know um
uh some of the bias and stuff
confirmation bias and things like that.
Uh, but there's a lot of others and even
things just like looking into things
like the the Mandela principle or or
syndrome or whatever it's called, but
the Mandela effect, I'm sorry. And some
of these things where it's like
it is it's like we brainwash ourselves
on a regular basis. And I think the
trust is one of those things is that we
need to make sure that we're we are
regularly checking in on these things so
that we haven't convinced ourselves that
we're doing something right when we
actually aren't. And I've seen teams
drift from that many times. We're like,
"Oh yeah, this is our guiding
principle." And you look at like, "No,
that's not your guiding principle. That
was never a guiding principle. I don't
know where that got introduced." And it
does go back to like write it down,
review it regularly, get yourself like
centered back, get your your your
cornerstone so you can build your wall
out from there.
That being said, this has been uh this
has been fun. Uh also a little bit
exhausting because there's just a lot
going on this time around. Uh but we
will be back. We will rest. We will
sleep. Probably not a lot, but we will
get some sleep in between now and the
next time we do this. So, we are fresh
and ready to take on whatever the next
topic is. Thank you so much for your
time, for hanging out with us, and we
will talk to you guys next time around.
[Music]
Transcript Segments
1.35

[Music]

27.359

Well, hello and welcome back. We are

31.359

able to breathe again. We've been

32.48

holding our breath since the last

33.68

episode. We're going to get into part

35.2

two of our interview with Adam Malone as

37.92

we continue our season on building

39.6

better foundations. But first, I am Rob

42.239

Broadhead, one of the founders of

43.52

Developer, also the founder of RB

45.36

Consulting, where we help you do

47.28

technology better. We sit down with you.

49.76

We help you assess where you are at,

51.68

where your business is at, not only

53.84

today, but also like what are your

55.28

plans? What are your visions? What are

56.559

your goals? And then we help you create

58.239

a roadmap to utilize technology better

61.28

than you're doing it today, but also to

63.12

position you for tomorrow so that you

64.64

have a road map for success that either

67.36

you can execute or you can team with us

70.08

uh will help you out as needed to

71.52

execute along the way, even completely

74.159

executing it for you if needed. Check us

76.479

out at rb-sns.com.

78.72

Uh you can also do a really quick and

80.64

quick and free assessment kind of thing

82.32

to get some advice at matrix mat r

85.119

ix.rb-sns.com

88.4

and check us out there. Uh good thing,

90.799

bad thing.

92.72

Uh good thing is uh so we're continuing

96.159

this uh uh working on a house that was

99.52

its own little good thing, bad thing.

101.36

And in doing so, uh it's like it's the

103.84

fun things that you have. So, we're

105.439

redoing some floors and a good thing is

107.84

one of them was like and it's lenolium

110.159

and it was laid out not terribly well

112.56

and it was pretty beat up but ripping it

114.88

up was super simple. It was like

118.079

basically you just like you know a

119.84

little hammer, a little nail, some stuff

121.36

like that, a little screwdriver to pry

122.799

some stuff up and then just lift and you

125.2

know a couple of minutes later and a few

127.2

you know not even very bad cuss words

129.44

and it's like everything's up and we're

131.28

ready to go. Uh the bad news is that we

134.16

did have one of the three rooms that was

136.4

we're not so lucky that the glue was

138.56

done differently and stuff like that. So

140.959

um I'm gonna have a lot of gun time with

143.36

a heat gun for a little bit as I'm

145.04

slowly like peeling my way through floor

147.28

for the next uh next little bit here. So

149.599

not the funnest thing. Hopefully more

153.04

not it will be much more fun to listen

155.36

to Michael and his introduction than

157.28

playing around with a heat gun. But you

158.64

never know. I guess it depends on how

160

much of a gadget person you are. Go a

162.08

introduce yourself.

163.2

>> Hey everyone, my name is Michael Malash.

165.04

I'm one of the founders of Building

166.239

Better Developers, also known as

167.84

Developer. I'm also the owner of

169.68

Envision QA, where we build custom

171.92

software that helps businesses owners

174.319

take back control of their operations

176.48

with a strong focus on service

178.4

reliability and long-term success. From

181.28

streaming to workflows to replacing

183.12

outdated systems, we create tools

185.04

tailored to your business. And we don't

187.12

stop there. We uh back everything

189.44

through testing and quality checks to

191.36

make sure it works right the first time.

193.28

Check us out at Envision QA where we

195.519

combine great software with great

197.04

support so you can run your business

198.56

with confidence. Uh good thing, bad

200.879

thing. Uh I guess uh good thing I've had

206.4

a little bit of kind of downtime. I've

208.879

been running some testing on software

210.72

and that which takes time and ties up my

212.56

computer. So, I've decided to clean my

214.56

office and well, I I've made lots of

218.08

progress in here. Uh the good thing is

220.08

I've eliminated probably two uh mini

223.12

bookshelves or a full bookshelf if you

224.72

got a big tall bookcase. Uh bad thing,

227.599

my office is completely trashed at the

229.68

moment. So, I'm I'm got to clean that up

232.56

next. But, uh hey, making progress.

236

And here we go. We're going to dive

237.84

right back into part two of our

240.159

conversation with Adam Malone. We're

242.4

talking about trust and building it and

245.04

how it impacts projects, teams, and all

247.599

that kind of goodness. So, here we go.

250.08

Picking up almost exactly right where we

252.879

left off.

255.599

>> So,

257.359

you know, we've been talking about

258.72

principles and you talked about just

260.32

now, you know, having the VP and the PMs

262.32

and that and breaking it out. As you go

265.12

through the process of working with the

267.36

all the players and you define these

269.44

principles, how often do you feel that

272.639

you need to go back and revisit the

274.56

principles to make sure that they're not

276.32

stale, that you're on track, and that

278.56

everyone continues to have the same

280

buyin for the project.

283.6

>> Um,

285.12

I would make them a touch point at

287.759

nearly every, you know, depending how

290.56

you run your projects. um you know not

292.96

daily but the the meetings where you're

295.919

reading out on status and that you're

298.08

especially kind of hashing through an

300.479

issue that you're having um they need to

303.36

start with this uh and ideally you've

306.96

you've codified these enough that they

308.56

are maybe one or two PowerPoint slides

310.96

and that you can say hey guys we are

314.16

here today uh because we have some

317.199

contention about how we handle this

319.44

business requirement.

321.52

Well, part of the reason that we are in

323.039

contention is

325.44

we don't all agree how that ties into

327.44

the principles we set out at the

328.72

beginning. As a reminder, here are the

330.8

principles that we agreed to for making

332.24

these decisions. Now, here's the

334.4

business requirement that we're trying

335.6

to work through and the solution. Bob,

339.28

you you cited that you were concerned

340.96

that we might not deliver against the

342.479

principles because of that. Can you

344.72

explain that? Yeah. Okay. And then you

347.68

actually ask people, hey, does everyone

349.84

agree with Bob? like can we all agree

353.039

that that the risk that he's cited would

355.919

violate the principles we've agreed to

358.56

because sometimes this is helping some a

360.96

member of the team see like hey you're

362.72

concerned about a risk that we've solved

365.12

for elsewhere right um and then also

369.039

saying does anyone else feel this way is

371.199

anyone else concerned about this as well

373.36

and having that conversation but um I

376.8

mean to put a timeline on it I would say

379.039

these should be in front of the team

380.24

almost every two weeks or so. Um, even

382.96

if it's just a, hey, this is our

385.12

bi-weekly readout. As we mentioned, here

387.52

are the five ways we're making the

389.039

decisions around here on this. Does

391.199

anyone have any concerns about those as

392.96

we kind of have learned more over the

394.479

last two weeks?

396.639

And 90% of the time, it's going to be

398.639

really annoying because no one has

400.08

anything to say. And you're going to be

401.52

like, why did we even spend five minutes

403.36

on this?

404.96

But it's that one time that someone

407.039

says,

408.639

"Hey,

410.4

when I was doing XYZ thing on that

413.039

business requirement, that's not how I

415.039

built it or that's not how the

417.28

development team is working on that or

418.8

that's not how the operations team is

420.16

going to deploy that because that's what

422.08

you have happen, right? Is the tech team

423.759

goes and does stuff and then the

425.599

operations team goes and does stuff of

427.28

like how they're going to operationally

429.36

handle the outcome of what the system

431.84

tells them frequently. and we don't like

434.4

go revisit those enough. And so that's

436.16

that's part of why I'm saying it's

437.52

helpful to look at them regularly and

439.759

also helpful to have the different views

442.96

from the team in there to say, "Oh, this

446.16

doesn't actually meet what I just built

447.68

with my team." Um, and get and make it

451.12

acceptable for people to say that.

452.319

They're not going to get in trouble when

453.52

they say that.

455.039

>> Now, with these principles, I I know

456.88

you're talking, you know, within your

458.56

team, within the products. Um,

461.44

have you defined or have you ever worked

463.68

out principles with dealing with the

465.199

customer like the end goal within these

468.479

principles or within different teams?

470.24

Um, just kind of curious how you handle

472

that or what your thought process is on

474.08

putting that together with a team that

475.919

may never have worked with something

477.36

like that.

479.039

>> Yeah. So definitely have and that can

482.72

that has involved everything from hey we

485.759

have a replacement strategy for how we

487.759

want to handle a customer who complains

489.68

about their product for example and

493.36

again if you say well we just want to

495.68

deliver the best customer experience

497.199

possible well that's going to mean that

500.639

you just give that customer a bunch of

502.4

either money directly or you you know

505.12

give them a Cadillac when they bought a

506.879

Kia. Um, and so helping people to to

511.44

really codify,

513.279

yes, we want a great customer

514.56

experience. What does that look like

517.36

when someone says, "Hey, I have a

519.039

product return as an example."

521.68

Okay, here's how we define as a group

526.08

what that should look like. Um, so

528.8

there's going to be some process

530

discussion. How do we treat the

531.519

customer?

533.44

What documentation do we ask for from

535.519

them? Are we going to require them to

538.16

return their product to us before we

540.16

give them a replacement product? All of

542.48

those things need to be discussed and

545.2

thought of through the lens of we want a

548.16

great customer experience, but we can't

549.839

break the bank and we have to be able to

551.6

deliver it in a reasonable time frame,

553.12

right? Um, and so defining those, here's

557.12

what we want that to look like, and then

559.36

really

561.76

meeting on them and being open to people

565.519

saying, "I don't like I don't think

568.399

we're delivering what we want or ideally

572.48

reviewing, especially if it's an

573.76

exception like a return or something

575.2

like that." Those likely happen

577.839

infrequently enough that you can bring

579.6

the team back and do afteraction reviews

582.08

and say like, "Hey, Michael called in.

584.399

He had a return. Let's walk through how

586.48

that return went for Michael." And then

588.399

we're going to like at the end everybody

590.32

raise your hand if you think we did the

591.839

right thing for Michael or if you think

593.76

we didn't do the right thing for

594.959

Michael, right? And and then you can

596.88

start to build group consensus on, you

600

know, I don't actually think we treated

601.839

him the way we all wanted to treat him

603.36

based on what we said the principles

604.8

are. Okay, then what do we need to go

606.399

fix and change? Um, but but too often we

612.08

can accidentally act like, well, if it's

614.079

a customer thing, the customer

616.64

experience team or the customer support

618.8

team needs to be involved and like the

620.72

rest of us kind of don't need to be

622.72

aware of it. Um,

625.76

or if it's a supply chain thing, hey, we

627.76

don't want anyone to come talk to us.

629.04

Like, we'll do a good job, you know,

630.48

shipping product out, but kind of stay

632.399

out of our business. drop the order to

633.92

the ERP and we'll handle it from there.

635.92

Well, we need every group to be okay

638.8

having those conversations about the

641.12

customer and the customer experience

643.839

um

645.36

in a way that we may tell each other

647.36

that the the baby's ugly and

651.279

and we all have to own again back to the

653.36

commit concept. We all have to own that

655.519

it's our baby. It's not Michael's baby

658.32

and Rob's baby or Adam's baby or

660.56

customer solutions baby or supply

662.24

chain's baby. This is what we all agreed

664.8

to build. So, we're not indicting anyone

667.519

when we say it's not delivering what we

669.2

want. We're if anyone's being indicted,

671.6

we're all in it together. We're not kind

673.44

of pointing fingers and throwing people

675.12

under the bus. I'm sorry I rambled a bit

677.76

there, Michael, but

678.56

>> Oh, that's great. I I kind of have a

680.72

follow-up to that. I kind of want to

681.92

flip that now. So we've talked talked a

684.72

lot about you know your team and

685.92

internally. So how do you build that

687.839

trust using the same kind of model with

689.6

your customer?

692.24

>> Okay. So um the trust is built on three

697.839

components and actually try not to say

699.68

build trust but we'll take that for

701.12

another time. Um there's three

703.44

components of trust. Uh

706.399

these are empathy,

708.8

authenticity and performance. And so

712

when someone chooses to give us their

714.16

trust, we have delivered on their need

717.68

to feel empathy,

719.92

to feel that we are being authentic and

722.56

to feel that we will deliver on our

724.72

performance or our commitments, right?

727.44

And so we are our goal is to the

730.399

language I like I want to inspire

732.56

Michael to give me his trust.

735.68

I don't get to build trust because it's

737.36

not permanent and I don't get to decide

739.04

when you trust me. I can invest in each

741.839

of those components of trust such that

744.56

you're inspired enough to give your

746.16

trust to me. So first I would try to use

748.959

that language of how do we inspire our

750.56

customers to trust us? And I would look

752.72

at each of those buckets. So empathy is

756.079

when someone feels like they are seen

758.16

and cared for. Um

762.24

uh here's an example of that. Um, have

765.44

you ever have you ever called into like

767.36

a call center because you had an issue

769.76

and um the call center rep just said

773.76

like, "Well, I'm sorry. We can't do

775.04

that."

776.56

And you How does that feel like when

779.04

they just kind of flatly tell you like,

780.48

"I'm sorry. That's not how it works. We

782.079

can't do that for you." Does that feel

783.6

good? You feel seen?

786.079

>> No. It's frustrating.

787.839

>> No, it's so frustrating.

790.56

And and so like what you can see is and

793.839

this can't be fake. That's going to be

795.2

on the authenticity piece. But on the

796.8

empathy piece, there are little cues

799.76

that can be so helpful in developing and

802.079

showing empathy to your customer. Hey,

805.279

Michael, I've heard your concern. I want

808.16

to make certain I understand it. You

810.24

said that this was the part of your

812.32

Dyson vacuum cleaner that wasn't

813.92

working. Did I get that right? Yeah.

816.24

Yeah, you did. You did. You got that

817.839

right. Okay. And I also heard you say X

822.48

is is did I understand that right as

824.959

well? Yes, it is. Okay. Can you help

828.32

tell me h how you would want this how

830.959

you want us to handle this for you or

832.32

what would solve this problem for you?

833.839

Well, all of a sudden the customer has

836.24

felt seen on what's going wrong. They

838

felt seen on kind of what their concern

840.32

was and now they've been engaged

842.079

potentially on well here's here are some

844.959

things I would like to do. You're going

846.959

to have lots of people that listen to

848.24

this to say like, "Well, you should

849.199

never ask a customer that." Um, but I'll

852.88

tell you, lots of times you'll find that

854.399

people actually want far less than you

857.36

think they do. They just want a new knob

859.519

for their vacuum cleaner or something.

861.92

Um, and so sometimes there can be a lot

863.519

of power in asking because you'll find

865.44

that there's a bunch of people that you

866.88

can just solve their problems outright

868.72

for them and it's way less than you

870.88

thought when you were going to build a

872.079

standard response. The second piece is

875.04

after that is you can say let me go let

878.639

me let me go review that for you right

880.8

let me go compare that and even if it's

884.079

just 10 seconds or 5 seconds where you

887.36

go and you kind of work on that and you

890.079

need to be authentic like I said but

891.6

that doesn't mean you know you have to

894.639

like go run it up to the CEO right but

897.279

can you can you display empathy and that

900.079

Michael's got a problem and he wants to

902.32

feel like someone actually tried to work

904.16

on it and didn't just look at a matrix

906.959

on a screen and go, "Sorry, I can't help

908.399

you with that." Right?

910.959

Um, so, so developing empathy is one,

915.199

showing authenticity is the second, and

918.24

authenticity is, do I think I'm getting

919.839

the real you? And so, when you're

922.48

engaging with a customer, the times

924.88

where they feel like they're not getting

926.079

the real you, that could be as simple as

928.959

tone of voice. Um, thank you for calling

933.199

AT&T.

935.199

Um, or you know, I've called Comcast a

938.72

couple times. You know, thanks for

940.959

reaching Comcast. It's a pleasure to

942.72

serve you. It's like,

945.279

I don't think so, bud. Like, we we're

947.6

starting this out in the wrong place.

949.6

But how often do we all have engagements

952

like that with like external customers

954.16

or even customers within our own company

956.72

that way of where we're just kind of

959.36

like reading from a script uh in our

961.44

actions and it doesn't even feel like

963.68

we're trying to be real. Well, we need

965.68

to show people that we authentically

968.16

care about them and their problem and

970.24

that they're seeing the real us. Um and

973.519

then finally on performance

976.24

um that's about do you have the skills

979.36

to help me with this problem

982.079

and then will you do so reliably?

985.6

Performance breaks really carefully or

988.32

easily into performance or capability

990.32

versus reliability.

992.399

Um and so we can improve people's

995.68

perceptions of our performance by

998.399

focusing on both of those. Hey, um,

1001.92

again using the Dyson vacuum example.

1004.24

Hey, miss, you know, Michael, um, we do

1008.32

have the part that you want in stock. I

1010.48

have allocated that part. It's it's on

1013.759

order for you and your name is attached

1016

to that order and you will get a

1018.8

whatever a confirmation code in your

1020.639

email in the next 10 minutes telling you

1022.24

that that that part is on the way.

1023.92

Right? So, you kind of you establish I

1026.319

have the thing. I know what to do with

1028.88

the thing. and here's a way that you can

1031.12

test my reliability because I've told

1033.52

you, hey, in 10 minutes or 30 minutes or

1036.319

an hour, you're going to get an email

1037.839

confirming your order. And so now you

1040.559

can expect that email. And when you get

1042.24

that email, all of a sudden, that's a

1044.4

confirmation point that I delivered on

1046

my performance. Um, and I think a a lot

1049.679

of the time that we fail with internal

1051.919

and external customers is we don't

1055.28

invest enough time and displaying

1058.16

um that we're going to be reliable. Um,

1060.4

but and reliability is actually a huge

1062.48

part of people's perception of

1064.799

performance. And so you can actually do

1068.799

yourself a disservice

1072.16

if you ignore those things. If your

1074.72

system has a gate that when it goes

1077.2

through people get notified, tell them

1078.88

about that. Your system is going to do

1080.72

it no matter what. But now when people

1083.039

see that happen, they're not like, "Oh

1084.48

my gosh, Rob sends me an email every 10

1087.12

minutes." No, they're going to say, "Oh,

1089.6

Rob told me that when my project kind of

1091.44

got through this stage gate, I would get

1093.2

an email or I would get a note. I got

1094.88

that note. Not only did Rob do what he

1097.039

said, but I feel good about the fact

1098.4

that my project moved forward or my

1100

shipment has come here or whatever." Um,

1102.559

and so using concepts like stage gates,

1106.08

even if they're to reinforce

1108.16

communication patterns, can really help

1110.559

develop trust in ways that are very low

1113.6

cost,

1115.28

often they only cost us communication,

1118.88

which is nearly free.

1122.96

>> Nice. Now,

1125.679

do you ever combine the two? So you have

1127.76

like your internal trust, your internal

1129.44

meetings kind of defining what you're

1131.44

doing. You have your customer experience

1133.039

and that do you ever uh how do you

1135.44

combine the two processes so that you

1137.2

know that your customer expectations and

1139.2

your internal expectations are kind of

1142.24

in line with each other?

1145.36

>> Yeah. So a lot of my experience has been

1147.039

in um regulated products like insurance

1150.24

products and so sometimes like you

1152.64

literally have compliance departments

1154.16

that are supposed to help you make sure

1155.919

you do that. Um,

1158.64

and both of you smiled real big when I

1160.48

said that. Um, and I would say part of

1164

the benefit that you can do is if you

1165.76

can help people see the value of that

1167.6

compliance department as opposed to, uh,

1171.76

the compliance people are here again to

1173.84

harass us. Instead, saying, hey, these

1177.28

are some of the few people in the

1178.4

business that see everything end to end.

1180.799

They can really help us inspect and

1182.4

understand what's going on. Um that's

1185.52

one way uh is through compliance. Um

1190.4

again I've dealt with a lot of physical

1192.08

products. So um I like to think of what

1195.919

we often called an outofbox experience.

1198.88

Um, and that was something like we would

1201.679

process an order and we would document

1206.559

all of that, whether it was screenshots

1208.48

or recordings or or whatever. And then

1211.039

when that physical product was

1212.72

delivered, we would document that. And

1215.12

then that physical product would like be

1216.88

opened in a conference room with people

1219.52

around the box saying things like, "Oh,

1222.559

like what is the experience like when

1224.08

you were opening that tab? Is that what

1225.919

we want for our customers? When I open

1228

the box, what is the first thing I see?

1230.64

Oh, like the first thing I see isn't

1233.52

very appealing or interesting. Okay.

1235.36

Well, I need to change that. Right? But

1237.76

bringing in a broad set of people to see

1240.08

the outcome of the work and then inspect

1242.96

like the process that got your customer

1244.799

there can really help you unite like

1247.84

front of office customer experience type

1250

people with operational and technology

1252.88

delivery people to say hey we all

1255.52

delivered this product to the customer.

1258.559

It took all of us to get here. What did

1261.039

that feel like through the entire

1262.4

journey? How can I show that to you as a

1264.799

customer journey and get as tangible as

1267.76

possible with it? Screenshots, videos,

1270.32

voice recordings, and then if you have

1272.559

something where there's a tangible

1273.84

physical product, if it can be opened

1276.88

like in a room with people huddled

1278.799

around it, like invest the time to fly

1281.76

people in and do that. Um, it is highly

1286.159

valuable and I think it's one of those

1288

places again that we can sometimes

1290.72

get a little cheap and we'll say like,

1292.4

well, I don't want to pay the travel

1293.6

budget or take people off the phones or

1295.44

get people off their computers to to do

1297.12

the dev work. So, we'll just have the

1299.919

leaders do it. We'll just have the VPs

1301.6

sit around and do this or something.

1303.919

That's the wrong way to do it. You need

1305.6

to bring as many people as possible that

1308

are scattered throughout the process to

1309.76

experience that stuff. Um, and some of

1312.24

that gets back to that concept of gimba

1313.84

that I'm talking about. But the the

1316.96

every single process in your company,

1319.6

there is a supplier

1321.84

um and there is a receiver.

1324.72

And um the more you can bring those

1327.44

people together to look at processes end

1329.52

to end um the better off you'll be in

1332.799

understanding the customer and

1335.28

understanding internal needs and in

1337.76

understanding the output.

1343.039

Well, after uh really appreciate your

1345.2

time and you know, giving us a lot of

1348.24

great insights. So, and I'm sure a lot

1350.24

of the the audiences out there

1351.52

applauding as well and saying, "Yeah,

1353.2

great time. It's standing ovation and

1355.28

stuff like that." What's the best way

1356.96

for people to get a hold of you if

1358.24

they're like, "I would really I think my

1360

team needs some help. I think I'd love

1362

Adam's help." What's the best way to get

1363.28

a hold of you?

1364.559

>> Oh, I appreciate that question. Uh the

1366.64

best way is uh just go to LinkedIn and

1369.84

search Adam Malone. Uh there's a black

1373.039

and white photo of a bearded pudgy white

1376.559

guy with a microphone. That's me. Uh

1379.52

click on that and send me a message. Uh

1381.52

I love to hear from people. Um and and

1384.559

whether that's you just want to kind of

1386.159

toss around, you know, an issue like

1388.24

this, you want someone to talk about it,

1389.6

I'd love to, you know, give you 45

1391.679

minutes and and do that sort of thing.

1393.2

It's it's the sort of thing I I enjoy

1395.679

doing. Um so I would love to hear from

1397.919

your listeners.

1399.36

>> Excellent. Well, and I'm sure they would

1401.12

love to like us, you know, a lot of

1403.2

great conversations around this. It's a

1404.96

it's and they're the kinds of

1406.559

conversations too that I think you walk

1407.919

away from and you sort of think like I

1409.36

wonder how I can apply this a little bit

1410.559

better and you know in this situation

1412.96

I'm running into or that situation or

1415.2

you know this person that I've been

1416.559

butting heads with things of that

1418.08

nature. So this is great value. Uh like

1420.96

I said, this has been perfect for us

1422.799

talking about like the foundations kind

1424.559

of, you know, of how do you really, you

1427.2

know, set yourself up for success moving

1429.28

forward. And one of them is, you know,

1431.12

like we talked about even like at the

1432.48

beginning getting those things in place

1434

and and being clear and a few less

1437.36

assumptions and a few more, you know,

1439.6

maybe even some some tough discussions,

1441.84

but you know, going through those things

1443.12

to make sure that we even if we're not

1445.2

on the same page, that we agree whatever

1446.88

page we're on and we can we can move

1448.559

forward from there.

1450.24

Yeah.

1450.88

>> Yeah. I think uh your call out there is

1453.279

really important that um we're we're

1456.88

going to have the argument one way or

1458.88

the other. And I think that's often why

1460.799

people shy away from a lot of the things

1462.32

we've talked about is they feel like it

1464.24

is conflict and argumentative and we're

1466.48

all going to not like each other. But in

1468.88

my experience, the argument is the

1471.12

disagreement is going to come to light

1472.64

at some point. And if it doesn't,

1474.24

failure is even more certain. But most

1476.64

of the time, that disagreement is going

1477.919

to come to light eventually.

1480

And just like, you know, just like fish,

1482.72

it doesn't get better with age. Like the

1484.559

earlier you have those discussions and

1486.4

those debates, um, the better off you'll

1489.2

be over the long term. Um, or you can

1491.76

like leave the fish in the back of the

1493.679

cabinet and, you know, it'll stink when

1496.4

you get there in two or 3 weeks or two

1498.24

or 3 months, right? Um, and the the

1500.96

fight is bigger and harder and worse

1502.559

than it was before. Um, so yeah, working

1505.039

through those early and often is almost

1507.12

always better. Excellent.

1510

I think that's a great place for us to

1511.84

wrap this one up. Well, thank you so

1513.36

much for your time and for hanging out

1514.96

with for us for a while. Uh it's been a

1516.96

great conversation. Uh a lot of great

1519.2

ideas going forward from here. So, I'm

1520.88

going to take some of this and be

1522.4

chewing on it mentally for a while as

1524.48

well. Uh you guys have we will have show

1527.12

uh links in the show notes to reach out

1529.12

and uh check out check in with Adam and

1531.76

ask your own questions and maybe have a

1533.2

little conversation as well. And uh

1535.44

hopefully we will uh you know we'll bump

1537.279

into you again sometime soon and uh you

1539.6

know appreciate your time. Appreciate

1540.88

you coming out here and hopefully we'll

1541.919

be able to continue to have some great

1543.44

trust conversations as we move forward.

1546.159

>> Thanks guys. It's been a pleasure.

1547.76

>> All right. Thanks a lot.

1548.72

>> Thank you.

1550.48

>> And that will wrap this up. So this was

1553.6

a great time with Adam. I want to thank

1555.2

him again so much. We've thanked him

1556.88

ausively hopefully affusively enough. Uh

1559.76

it was great. It's been a while since

1561.279

we've done a an interview. I really

1563.919

appreciate him stepping in and doing

1565.6

that. Uh, and it was a great

1567.12

conversation as I think you guys know if

1568.88

you guys so often if you guys got half

1571.679

out of it what I did then I'm sure that

1574

it was more than worth your while. Um,

1576.88

we will have l as I mentioned we will

1578.64

have links to to reach out to him if you

1580.559

have questions or if you want to have

1581.679

some conversations. Great guy. Uh, I've

1584

had a couple conversations with him in

1585.44

the past and I think you can get a lot

1587.279

out of it. And uh if you're, you know,

1589.6

if your company's struggling with some

1590.96

stuff, then uh he's definitely that kind

1592.799

of guy that you want to point the right

1594.88

people to and have them come in and

1596.799

maybe straighten a few people out and

1598.24

get your team back on track, get the

1600

train back on the rails.

1602.64

That being said, it is that time where I

1605.44

have to ask you for an email. Send me an

1607.039

email at [email protected], but more

1609.279

importantly, give us feedback however it

1610.799

is you can give us feedback. Whether

1612.24

that is leaving us a review and and some

1614.96

comment text on wherever you do

1616.88

podcasts. You can do it out on YouTube

1618.559

at the developer channel. You can we

1620.159

have a contact us form on the

1621.44

developer.com site. You can leave

1624

comments on any of our blog posts over

1626.4

the last several years. Uh you can also

1628.96

leave us something. Send us something at

1630.559

xdevelopure

1632.559

uh Facebook page. We're out there as

1634.559

well. And someday we'll probably add

1636.24

some additional sites as well. Uh but

1638.559

for now, all of those places are great

1640.48

ways and positive or negative, we want

1642.64

to get your feedback because that is

1644.4

what helps us grow. We're going to let

1647.12

you guys uh dive back into whatever it

1649.679

is you're doing, becoming better,

1651.279

building that better foundation,

1652.64

becoming better developers, and we will

1654.96

return next episode most likely back on

1658.64

topic. But uh we'll see whether we

1660.72

decide to throw another curveball and

1662.96

get another interview in there. We are

1664.32

going to mix it up a little bit in this

1665.52

season of Foundations. Uh but there are

1668.08

a lot of areas for us to cover uh to

1671.36

help you build that better foundation so

1673.6

that you're ready to go and you know

1675.36

you're ready to take advantage of

1676.72

whatever your career in life throws at

1678.88

you. As always we appreciate appreciate

1681.279

you guys so much. Have yourself a great

1683.44

day, a great week and we will talk to

1685.6

you next time

1689.679

and bonus material. Um so we've got like

1695.039

a little mix and match stuff. we had

1696.48

some bonus material at the start of last

1698.48

one basically and then just sort of a

1700.159

quick wrap-up. Um I guess bonus would be

1703.44

just like what are your thoughts? How do

1704.88

you what are like maybe is there what's

1706.32

a good takeaway? Let's like what's the

1708

takeaway that you had from the

1708.96

conversation with Adam?

1710.48

>> So it's interesting because I take it

1713.36

he's in a product based like a physical

1715.36

product based uh industry with a lot of

1718.159

the discussions he was talking about

1719.6

with the trust in principles and things

1721.44

of that nature. It it was just very

1723.919

interesting how a lot of it follows like

1727.84

the agile principles with software

1729.679

development if we actually follow agile

1732.159

correctly and we do our sprints right

1733.84

where you can have those discussions to

1736.559

reinstill the trust. Uh a lot of what I

1739.36

was hearing really reflected you know

1741.76

defining the definition of done what is

1744.08

done which is uh you know kind of his

1746.88

whole guidelines those principles he was

1748.799

talking about. Um, I just thought it was

1752.399

a wellrounded

1754.399

uh discussion with them. He had a lot of

1757.44

uh knowledge and information that was

1759.6

really great for him to share with us.

1762.159

Yeah, I think that um it's a little

1765.6

scary and I had this the first time I

1767.76

talked to him as well is when you have

1769.52

the

1771.12

um I don't know what it's called, but

1773.36

it's basically the you know, we'll call

1775.039

it the, you know, the nodding head

1776.72

syndrome or the yes man syndrome or

1778.64

something like that where everybody's

1779.6

just sort of like, "Yeah, it's going

1780.88

well and all's going good."

1783.12

Um, I've had that in more than a few

1785.52

places where, you know, you get into and

1787.44

even with daily standups where people

1789.2

just get into like this rhythm of, "Yep,

1791.679

this is what I'm doing. Yeah, it's fine.

1793.12

Everything's good. Every, you know, it's

1794.48

sunshine and roses. Let's just keep

1796

marching on as opposed to, you know,

1799.44

having and a lot of times it is like if

1801.6

it's an agile, it's the scrum masters

1803.44

probably should be doing that stuff like

1804.64

that." It's just somebody sort of that's

1806.96

rocking the boat a little bit to say,

1808.96

"Hey, is it really?" You know, it's just

1810.88

like when you pass somebody on the

1812.159

street a lot of times like, "Hey, how

1813.44

you doing?" They're like, "It's great.

1814.96

It's fine."

1816.88

Sometimes it's useful to come back and

1818.72

say, "Really? Is it really fine or are

1821.52

you just saying that?" And I think we

1823.84

that is something that even although I

1826

agree, I think agile helps us break it

1827.76

up. We have a lot of if you do it right,

1831.039

at least at each sprint, you have the

1832.64

retrospective and the review and you

1834.24

have like a really good

1837.12

point, you know, stopping and uh true up

1841.039

point kind of thing, you know, a gut

1842.799

check of, okay, well, let's talk about

1844.24

this. Where are we going? How are we

1845.52

doing? So, you don't get too far into

1847.2

it. But I do think that that is

1849.12

something again that you have to be

1851.039

aware of is that like you have to make

1852.88

sure that when you get into those

1854

retrospectives that people are being you

1857.6

know a part of that that they are acting

1859.76

that they are bringing in you know

1861.76

positives and negatives and stuff like

1863.2

that. You don't want to have them turn

1865.44

into just like a big kumbaya thing and

1867.52

everything's awesome and we all love

1868.96

everything. you. It's, you know, it's

1871.039

almost in a lot of places that's just

1873.279

like you have to come up with two things

1875.44

we can do better or two things that you

1877.279

don't like or two things that we need to

1879.76

stop doing or something like that. Just

1881.36

you give people an assignment so they

1883.279

have to figure something out. If they

1885.12

really struggle because you're so

1886.64

perfect in your software development

1888.159

group or whatever, then great. But

1890.64

usually something's going to come up.

1892.24

And usually when you get a team, there's

1894.48

going to be more than one person that's

1895.84

going to hit on those, which is going to

1897.44

help you get to, you know, the truth of

1900.159

it all. And it's, you know, it really is

1903.12

worth, I think, as a final

1905.12

recommendation, I would just say it's

1906.559

worth it to everybody to go spend a

1908.72

little bit of time understanding how we

1912.64

screw with ourselves mentally. Um, the

1916

uh loser think by Scott Adams I have

1918.32

recommended many times. I continue to do

1920.08

so because it is it is not a light read.

1922.799

I mean, yes, he did Dilbert and he's got

1925.12

some Dilbert cartoons in there, but it

1927.039

is um it will make you think. Uh and

1931.039

it's I think that's the purpose and it

1932.559

will make you it will point out some of

1934.32

the things that uh you need to be

1936.559

worried about when you are thinking and

1938.64

how we confuse and and fool ourselves.

1941.44

And if you just look at like um I would

1944.24

even say just do like a Google search or

1946.399

ask you know your favorite AI chatbot

1948.88

about

1950.559

um ways that we fool ourselves mental

1953.679

issues that we don't realize we have uh

1956.159

things like you know um

1959.44

uh some of the bias and stuff

1960.88

confirmation bias and things like that.

1963.279

Uh, but there's a lot of others and even

1965.36

things just like looking into things

1967.6

like the the Mandela principle or or

1970.399

syndrome or whatever it's called, but

1971.679

the Mandela effect, I'm sorry. And some

1973.2

of these things where it's like

1975.6

it is it's like we brainwash ourselves

1977.519

on a regular basis. And I think the

1979.6

trust is one of those things is that we

1982

need to make sure that we're we are

1983.84

regularly checking in on these things so

1986

that we haven't convinced ourselves that

1988

we're doing something right when we

1990.559

actually aren't. And I've seen teams

1992.08

drift from that many times. We're like,

1993.679

"Oh yeah, this is our guiding

1994.88

principle." And you look at like, "No,

1996.24

that's not your guiding principle. That

1997.6

was never a guiding principle. I don't

1998.799

know where that got introduced." And it

2001.12

does go back to like write it down,

2002.88

review it regularly, get yourself like

2005.039

centered back, get your your your

2006.64

cornerstone so you can build your wall

2008.24

out from there.

2010.799

That being said, this has been uh this

2013.519

has been fun. Uh also a little bit

2015.279

exhausting because there's just a lot

2016.799

going on this time around. Uh but we

2019.6

will be back. We will rest. We will

2021.84

sleep. Probably not a lot, but we will

2023.84

get some sleep in between now and the

2025.36

next time we do this. So, we are fresh

2027.76

and ready to take on whatever the next

2030.08

topic is. Thank you so much for your

2031.919

time, for hanging out with us, and we

2033.519

will talk to you guys next time around.

2038.19

[Music]